On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Houghton,Andrew <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
>> Brett Bonfield
>> However, just to be clear, rev=canonical != rel=canonical.
>> They are discrete responses to distinct issues.
> Agreed. Another issue with rev=canonical is that I don't believe that
> rev= is going to be supported in HTML 5.
That's correct. As a couple of the posts I pointed to mention, the
current plan isn't simply to deprecate rev (and then explain why rev
has been deprecated) but to omit it completely.