On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Jonathan Rochkind <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Wait, is this the same or different than <link rel="canonical">, as in:
> <link rel="canonical"> seemed like a good idea to me. But when I start
> reading some of those URLs, it's not clear to me if they're talking about
> the same thing or not.
Different. Which is one of the problems with rev=canonical.