LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  April 2009

CODE4LIB April 2009

Subject:

Re: resolution and identification

From:

Jonathan Rochkind <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 1 Apr 2009 13:20:52 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (132 lines)

I was talking to Ross a bit in channel about this, but one consideration 
is encouraging consistency.

If everyone uses  http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/[whatever] to identify 
that, that's fine.  If some people were using that, and other people 
were using http://purl.org/NET/dc..., and other people were using 
http://dc.org/..., and other people were inventing new things all the 
time, it would be problematic.

That's unlikely to happen to DC.  In part because the DC organization, 
which is responsible for the DC elements, has officially endorsed and 
propagated those particular identifiers.

So long as everyone is using the same http identifiers, they are indeed 
inter-changeable with info style identifiers, with the added bonus that 
they potentially have some kind of de-referencing built in, and that 
they don't make things more complicated with non-http URI schemes. 
(Those two are the arguments for using http, right?).

With something that was in fact created for the web, by a particular 
organization, that published those http uris.... this is quite likely to 
occur.

With legacy identifiers that were not created by the web (like sudoc), 
that  potentially have a distributed mechanism of control (like ISBN, 
and in a different way DOI), and especially where the controlling 
organization has not in fact endorsed a _particular_ http template for 
URIs...  it's somewhat more likely for there to be confusion, and lack 
of consistency. Which would cause problems.

Karen seems to be saying that becuase _lots_ of people don't understand 
the difference between http URL as a locater for a particular protoclol, 
and http URI as an identifier independent of de-referencing, this 
confusion could become a problem.

 From my point of view, http URIs _used with consistency and 
apprpropriately_ and info URIs are more or less interchangeable. But 
they both have pros and cons in terms of convenience (the convenience of 
being able to de-reference a URI as a locater to mroe information), and 
in terms of likelyhood of encouraging consistency.  One of the benefits 
of info is that it comes with an inherent built-in registry to encourage 
consistency.

Jonathan

Ross Singer wrote:
> I would counter that Dublin Core has been pretty successful with:
>
> http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/
>
> and
>
> http://purl.org/dc/terms/
>
> More so than MODS and SRU combined, I would say.  What does that say
> to you (other than LC's bad SEO strategy)?
>
> -Ross.
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>   
>> A concrete example.
>>
>> The MODS schema, version 3.3, has an info identifier, for SRU purposes:
>>
>> info:srw/schema/1/mods-v3.3
>>
>> So in an SRU request you can say"
>>
>> recordSchema=info:srw/schema/1/mods-v3.3
>>
>> Meaning you want records returned in the mods version 3.3 schema.  And
>> that's really the purpose of the schema identifier. Both the client and
>> server know the schema by this identifier  - or the server doesn't know it
>> at all and the request fails - but nobody wants to resolve the identifier.
>>
>> Now in contrast, the schema is at
>> http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd
>>
>> And it's also at:
>> http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd
>>
>> And also:
>> http://www.loc.gov/mods/mods.xsd
>>
>> And:
>> http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/mods.xsd
>>
>> And:
>> http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods.xsd
>>
>>
>>
>> So there you have five http "identifiers" for the schema.
>>
>> Which is the better identifier for this purpose? The single info identifer,
>> or a choice http identifers, one for  every possible location where the
>> schema may reside (which is more than these five).    If the answer is that
>> it's better to use one of the http identifiers, how do you know that the one
>> you pick is the one that the server recognizes it by?  Or should the server
>> maintain a list of all possible locations?
>>
>> --Ray
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ross Singer" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 12:26 PM
>> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] resolution and identification (was Re: [CODE4LIB]
>> registering info: uris?)
>>
>>
>>     
>>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>       
>>>> But shouldn't we be able to know the difference between an identifier and
>>>> a
>>>> locator? Isn't that the problem here? That you don't know which it is if
>>>> it
>>>> starts with http://.
>>>>         
>>> But you do if it starts with http://dx.doi.org
>>>
>>> I still don't see the difference.  The same logic that would be
>>> required to parse and understand the info: uri scheme could be used to
>>> apply towards an http uri scheme.
>>>
>>> -Ross.
>>>       
>
>   

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager