LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  August 2009

CODE4LIB August 2009

Subject:

Re: [Fwd: [ol-tech] Modified RDF/XML api]

From:

Karen Coombs <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:57:59 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (111 lines)

Yes, the WorldCat Search API offers MARCXML. It is a bear to work with,
which is why MODS seems like a slightly better route. Smarter than DC but
not has beastly as MARCXML. I actually don't anything from the MARC fixed
fields right now. So the fact that that information is missing isn't a
problem.

In terms of what Ed Summers said, I agree wholeheartedly. OpenLibrary
doesn't need to match what OCLC is doing, but they should be aware of what
is going on there and think about how stuff might dovetail nicely for
developers.

I'll also second his OpenSearch request. Love the ease of using OpenSearch.
My favorite output to work with from WorldCat Search API now are the
Atom/RSS outputs. These standards are so flexible (you can include other
schemas in them) and well known beyond libraryland.

Karen


On 8/11/09 11:09 AM, "Karen Coyle" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Karen,
> 
> I assume that MARCXML is one of those formats? As for MODS, that's
> possible although at the moment names would not be broken down. OL is
> working on altering its storage of names to include separate given and
> family portions, so that will be possible in the future.
> 
> Note that an initial MARCXML implementation will not be full MARC, in
> the sense that the OL record doesn't store most of the MARC fixed field
> data. In the case where the original input record was a MARC record,
> more work needs to be done to combine that original record with OL
> enhancements and export as full MARC.
> 
> kc
> 
> Coombs, Karen A wrote:
>> Karen,
>> 
>> I hate to say it but as someone who is working with the WorldCat Search API
>> at this point I sure could create code that used Open Library data faster if
>> you used one of the same metadata formats that the WorldCat Search API uses.
>> While the two services seem different, (I haven't really figured out how to
>> effectively search with the Open Library API) there is a learning curve just
>> working with different metadata formats. It would be good not to have to
>> teach my staff about another format if I don't have to. That being said, I'd
>> love to see MODS, that is if it is really good MODS where names are broken
>> out into their component parts (given, family) and roles are included.
>> 
>> Karen
>> 
>> 
>> On 8/10/09 3:42 PM, "Karen Coyle" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> 
>>   
>>> I'd really appreciate some testing and any comments folks have. Thanks, kc
>>> 
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject:  [ol-tech] Modified RDF/XML api
>>> Date:  Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:32:25 -0700
>>> From:  Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Reply-To:  Open Library -- technical discussion <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To:  Open Library -- technical discussion <[log in to unmask]>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The Open Library API that returns bibliographic data in RDF/XML has been
>>> greatly modified. To make use of it, simply add '.rdf' to the end of the
>>> bibliographic identifier:
>>>     http://openlibrary.org/b/OL6807502M.rdf
>>> 
>>> and of course it can be used in a curl command as:
>>>     curl 'http://openlibrary.org/b/OL6807502M.rdf'
>>> 
>>> The output relies heavily on DCMI Metadata Terms ("dcterms") [1] for its
>>> properties, but also makes use of Bibliontology [2] and RDA Vocabulary
>>> [3] where those present a better fit. Because it is in XML, this
>>> provides what we hope will be an easy-to-use format that makes use of
>>> commonly known metadata terms.
>>> 
>>> Not all data elements are included in the output, in particular there is
>>> no attempt at this point to export the tables of contents fields. That
>>> could be a future enhancement.
>>> 
>>> We would appreciate any comments you have on this API, as well as
>>> suggestions and corrections.
>>> 
>>> There are a number of different bibliographic formats that we could
>>> return in our APIs: MARCXML, MODS, EndNote import, ... I would be
>>> particularly interested to hear if there are particular formats that you
>>> would find immediately useful.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> kc
>>> [1] http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/
>>> [2] http://bibliontology.com/
>>> [3] http://metadataregistry.org/schema/show/id/1.html
>>>     
>> 
>>   
> 

-- 
Karen A. Coombs
Head of Libraries' Web Services
University of Houston
114 University Libraries
Houston, TX  77204-2000
Phone: (713) 743-3713
Fax: (713) 743-9811
Email: [log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager