I agree with Ed.  It would be best to omit the statement about the
cover image if it doesn't actually exist.

Keith


On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Ed Summers<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Karen Coyle<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Does it work for folks if this returns either a cover OR a blank? (1x1 jpg).
>> It may be awkward to test first for an actual cover. Also, if it's ok to not
>> test for a cover, does anyone have a preference over the blank or a 404
>> error? I think the API can do both.
>
> My personal preference would be to include the assertion about the
> cover image only if it's true. It might be better to say nothing than
> having to live with the false positives. But maybe some other people
> feel differently about it.
>
> //Ed
>