I have to agree with Ed.  You should have a good policy in place for backing
up your data.  Just throwing it on a server isn't a policy.

At the same time I would have to disagree with Ed.  You should look at S3 as
if it was your own server.  What is the guarantee that you supply to your
users with your own server.  The snap server we use here (instead of S3) is
the back up to a back up system already in place.


On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Edward M. Corrado <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> Rosalyn's post  made me think of one more thing.... if you are looking into
> outside entities (such as we are), what are the terms of service and what
> guarantee do they offer they won't lose your data? I believe that A3 does
> not offer any guarantee, so if you go with them, you probably want to have
> some other form of storage as well. Even if they offered a guarantee, what
> good is it once they loose your documents you were trying to preserve?
>
> Edward Corrado
>
>
>
>
> Rosalyn Metz wrote:
>
>> Hi Edward,
>>
>> Might I suggest you look into cloud computing services if you're looking
>> at
>> different options. (I know you're all shocked I suggested it).  If our
>> budget weren't so abysmal (and going to get worse) we would be using it
>> right now rather than the snap server we purchased with leftover funds.
>>  The
>> benefits of using the cloud is of course the elasticity it offers you.
>>  The
>> negative is that you have to pay to put your files into the cloud and then
>> pay again to take them out (and since we've already been slashed 30% and
>> are
>> guaranteed another slash...that idea was shot down).
>>
>> Of course the major player out there is Amazon S3.  The problem is that
>> you
>> can't use S3 via Amazon's Web Management Console.  But there is a company
>> called RightScale (http://www.rightscale.com/index.php) which has a web
>> management console that allows you to upload files quickly and easily
>> without having to write scripts and what not.
>>
>> Anyway, just my two cents.
>>
>> Rosalyn
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Edward Iglesias
>> <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> As I was trying to figure out what to do with half a terabyte of
>>> archival TIFFS it occurred to me that perhaps someone else had this
>>> problem.  We are starting to produce massive amounts of digital
>>> objects (videos, archival TIFFS, audio interviews).  Up until now we
>>> have been dealing with ways to display them to the public.  Now we are
>>> starting to look at "dark archives" like OCLC's digital archive
>>> product.  I would welcome any suggestions from those of you who have
>>> dealt with this on an archival level.  It's one thing to stick the
>>> stuff up on a server, but then what?  Our CIO suggested storage
>>> appliances like this one
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.drobo.com/products/index.php
>>>
>>> but I am wary of the proprietary RAID system.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> Edward Iglesias
>>> Systems Librarian
>>> Central Connecticut State University
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>