Heh, Declan can't even make Declan do pushups... ;)
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 5:25 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] preconference proposals
Dear David and Declan,
It sounds like you're both looking for "Solr White Belt" which I am
planning to teach. Can't wait to see you there!
So, if we're going with this karate theme, does that mean I can make
Declan do pushups when he acts out?
for the current pre-conf descriptions.
On 17-Nov-09, at 8:13 AM, David A. Faler wrote:
> I'd like a basic session as well. Something for people like me that
> hear Solr is great, but aren't even sure exactly what it is.
> Also, is there a conference price, or is it just the hotel room? I
> can't find anything on the website price wise other than $119/night
> for the hotel.
> Thank you,
> David Faler
> IT Quality Control and Testing
> The Library Corporation
> ----- "Declan Fleming" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Hi - I understand that getting a package up and running can be fairly
>> quick, but going over simple (then complex) examples really helps me
>> fully understand what's happening. Remember those "perl by Example"
>> books? I loved that approach to showing concretely what happens
>> step of the way. It probably seems dead simple once you've climbed
>> learning curve, I just haven't had the time committed to do that yet,
>> especially in a space with people who could help me.
>> Yes, it IS all about me. ;)
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
>> Gabriel Farrell
>> Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 4:11 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] preconference proposals
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 02:47:42PM +0000, Jodi Schneider wrote:
>>> If you'd be up for it Erik, I'd envision a basic session in the
>>> Some of us (like me) have never gotten Solr up and running.
>>> Then the afternoon could break off for an advanced session.
>>> Though I like Bess's idea, too! Would that be suitable for a
>>> breakout? Not sure I'd want to pit it against Solr advanced