Maybe you'd have to be e.e. cummings, but maybe not:  the keyword  
"refactotum" leads to this:

   http://blog.thinkrelevance.com/2008/5/23/refactotum-overview

...which was what he described, and which sounds like a great session  
when led by the right hands.  I think we could do it at c4lc.



On Nov 10, 2009, at 10:44 AM, Jay Luker wrote:

> Those.
>
> Slides.
>
> Don't.
>
> Help.
>
> --jay
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Tom Keays <[log in to unmask]>  
> wrote:
>> Bad URL there. The real one is
>> http://code4lib.org/files/chicks-lightning.pdf (that's where all the
>> other lightning talks were stored).
>>
>> t
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Jay Luker <[log in to unmask]>  
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Dan Chudnov <[log in to unmask] 
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>  - "Heckle Me", based on the example/ideas behind Chick's  
>>>> lightning talk
>>>> last year
>>>>
>>>
>>> The PDF of chick's slides is 404-ing [1]. Can someone remind me what
>>> this was about?
>>>
>>> --jay
>>>
>>> 1 http://code4lib.org/conference/2009/chicks-lightning.pdf
>>>
>>