Loins, Daniel wrote:
> Well, I've been meaning to toss New Haven, CT, into the ring, but was waiting to get more feedback/expressions of interest from my colleagues here (and also thinking that 2012 might be better for East Coast).
>
> Anyway, I can try to have a skeletal proposal ready by the 5th (unless someone at Yale tries to talk me out of it).
> Daniel
>   
Personally, I think the more applications the better. So I say go for 
it. Also, I hope some of the sites that weren't voted in last time 
re-submit their application.

Edward




> On Mar 2, 2010, at 10:15 PM, Michael J. Giarlo wrote:
>
>   
>> SIDEBAR:
>>
>> Granted "these economic times," but am I the only one who's surprised
>> not to hear more interest in hosting next year's conference?  Yes,
>> yes, we're a bunch of damned procrastinators, I know.
>>
>> -Mike
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 21:41, William Denton <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>     
>>> On 2 March 2010, Ziso, Ya'aqov wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Many institutions would consider Canada an international conference, and
>>>> most likely would allow (if any!?) one. My 5 cents (and that's all left in
>>>> the budget),
>>>>         
>>> s/Many/Many American/ but I know what you mean.  I don't see a local chapter
>>> meeting as conflicting with the full conference, and don't think that's
>>> anything to worry about.
>>>
>>> I'd like to go to Vancouver for a Code4Lib---it's certainly easy for me to
>>> get to, from Toronto, and I won't have the difficulties and anxieties that
>>> come from travelling into the US---but I hope some small to mid-size
>>> American cities put in too.  Providence and Asheville were great to visit.
>>>
>>> Bill
>>> --
>>> William Denton, Toronto : miskatonic.org www.frbr.org openfrbr.org
>>>
>>>