+1 for Austin. Especially if we can time it the week before or after SXSW. 



Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed

-----Original Message-----
From:         Becky Yoose <[log in to unmask]>
Date:         Wed, 3 Mar 2010 08:44:44 
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4Lib 2011 Proposals

Any word on if the Austin, TX folks are going to submit a proposal this
year? They had a pretty good run for votes last year...

Thanks,
Becky


import motivation
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Edward M. Corrado <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> Loins, Daniel wrote:
>
>> Well, I've been meaning to toss New Haven, CT, into the ring, but was
>> waiting to get more feedback/expressions of interest from my colleagues here
>> (and also thinking that 2012 might be better for East Coast).
>>
>> Anyway, I can try to have a skeletal proposal ready by the 5th (unless
>> someone at Yale tries to talk me out of it).
>> Daniel
>>
>>
> Personally, I think the more applications the better. So I say go for it.
> Also, I hope some of the sites that weren't voted in last time re-submit
> their application.
>
> Edward
>
>
>