On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Paul Joseph <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> No need to be concerned about the vendors: they're the same suspects who
> sponsored C4L10.
Just to be clear on this -- the same suspects actually shelled out far
less for C4L10 than they had in the past.
And we had far fewer sponsors than we had in, say, Portland (which
required similar economic gymnastics, in a much stronger economy, to
keep it affordable).