I'm a bit hesitant about removing delicious from the feed because I
think this burst is a temporary only. I like the idea that anything
code4lib will come in "one feed package" (that is, I don't have to go
and check on separate places.) But one's mileage might vary. If the
majority want it removed from the feed, then it's fine by me.
ranti.
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Kevin S. Clarke <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> +1 to all that as well
>
> Kevin
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Michael J. Giarlo
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> +1 to removing flickr
>> +1 to removing delicious as well
>> +1 to jrochkind using his discretion
>>
>> -Mike
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:36, Jonathan Rochkind <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> Yep, I agree, I'll remove flickr from the planet.
>>>
>>> CC'ing code4lib listserv in case anyone cares, you can make your case (on
>>> list or in private email to me), but at the moment as 'editor' of the planet
>>> I'm exersizing my editorial discretion to agree with Bernadette (I had the
>>> same opinion, but was waiting to see if any 'users' asked for it before
>>> doing it. :) ).
>>>
>>> [Other options for awareness of code4lib photos: 1) Someone could add a
>>> link to flickr search for tag code4lib to the code4lib home page, perhaps
>>> under 'photos'. 2) If you happen to know that there are a bunch of photos
>>> at a given time (like now), you could delicious-bookmark the _search
>>> results_ for 'code4lib' tag on flickr. Delicious tag code4lib is still on
>>> the planet. But please don't bookmark every individual photo, or we'll be
>>> back at square 1, heh. 3) Something else I haven't thought of. ]
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>>
>>> Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 27, 2010, at 2:33 PM, Bernadette Houghton wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Eric, all the code4lib photos currently being posted on flickr are
>>>>> playing havoc with my feed reader and driving me around the bend. Would it
>>>>> be possible to remove that feed from planet code4lib? Or at least, if photos
>>>>> must be posted, can they be posted to a single web page so that feed readers
>>>>> don't get clogged up with 200 or so photos. There must have been at least
>>>>> that many in these past few days.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm sorry, but I am unable to help you in this regard. Maybe Jonathan
>>>> Rochkind <[log in to unmask]> will be able to help...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
Bulk mail. Postage paid.
|
