For whatever little it may be worth, I'm finding that the (to me)
noise on this list is greatly outweighing the signal at the moment,
because of all the regional stuff. I'd welcome a splitting of the
list.
On 8 April 2010 13:28, Ranti Junus <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I have no preference whether the planning discussions for regional
> meetings would be conducted on code4lib or code4lib-[regional]. If the
> regional group decides to have their own list, I do appreciate the
> occasional shout-outs about it on the code4lib.
>
> Moreover, discussions for regionals that are located in a country
> where official language is not English, it would probably easier for
> those groups to have their own list.
>
>
> thanks,
> ranti.
>
>
> --
> Bulk mail. Postage paid.
>
>
|