LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  May 2010

CODE4LIB May 2010

Subject:

Re: MODS and DCTERMS

From:

Jonathan Rochkind <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 3 May 2010 10:24:30 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (57 lines)

I'm still confused about all this stuff too, but I've often see the 
oai_dc format (for OAI/PMH I think?) used as a 'standard' way to expose 
simple DC attributes.

One thing I was confused about was whether the oai_dc format _required_ 
the use of the "old style" DC uri's, or also allowed the use of the 
DCterms URIs?   Anyone know?  I kind of think it actually requires the 
old-style DC uri's, as it was written before "dcterms". 

At least it is one standardized way to expose the old basic DC elements, 
with a specific XML schema.

Jonathan

Riley, Jenn wrote:
> Hi MJ,
>
>   
>> - for that matter, is there a good example of how to "properly"
>> serialize DCTERMS for eg. a converted MARC/MODS record in XML (or
>> RDF/XML)?  I see, eg. <http://dublincore.org/documents/dcq-rdf-xml/>
>> which has been replaced by <http://dublincore.org/documents/dc-rdf/>
>> but I'm not sure if the latter obviates the former entirely?  Also, the
>> examples at the bottom of the latter don't show, eg. repeated elements
>> or DCMES elements.  Do we abandon http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/
>> entirely?
>>     
>
> This has always been ridiculously confusing! Here's my understanding (though anyone else, please chime in and correct me if I've misunderstood):
>
> - With the maturation of the DCMI Abstract Model <http://dublincore.org/documents/abstract-model/>, new bindings were needed to express features of the model not obvious in the old RDF, XML, and XHTML bindings.
>
> - For RDF, <http://dublincore.org/documents/dc-rdf/> is stable and fully intended to replace <http://dublincore.org/documents/dcq-rdf-xml/>.
>
> - For XML (the non-RDF sort), the most current document is <http://dublincore.org/documents/dc-ds-xml/>, though note its status is still (after 18 months) only a proposed recommendation. This document itself replaces a transition document <http://dublincore.org/documents/2006/05/29/dc-xml/> from 2006 that never got beyond Working Draft status. To get a stable XML binding, you have to go all the way back to 2003 <http://dublincore.org/documents/dc-xml-guidelines/index.shtml>, a binding which predates much of the current DCMI Abstract Model.
>
> - Many found the 2003 XML binding unsatisfactory in that it prescribed the format for individual dc and dcterms properties, but not a full XML format - that is, there was no DC-sanctioned XML root element for a qualified DC "record". (This gets at the very heart of the difference in perspective between RDF and XML, properties and elements, etc., I think, but I digress...) The folks I'm aware of that developed workarounds for this were those sharing QDC over OAI-PMH. I find the UIUC OAI registry <http://oai.grainger.uiuc.edu/registry/> helpful for investigations of this sort. A quick glance at their report on Distinct Metadata Schemas used in OAI-PMH data providers <http://oai.grainger.uiuc.edu/registry/ListSchemas.asp> seems to suggest that CONTENTdm uses this schema for QDC <http://epubs.cclrc.ac.uk/xsd/qdc.xsd> and DSpace uses this one <http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dcterms.xsd>. The latter doesn't actually define a root element either, but since here a!
>  t least the QDC is inside the wrappers the OAI-PMH response requires it's well-formed. What someone does with that once they get it and unpack it, I don't know, since without a container it won't be well-formed XML. The former goes through several levels of importing other things and eventually ends up importing from an .xsd on the Dublin Core site, but they define a root element themselves along the way. (I think.)
>
> - So what does one do? I guess it depends on who your target consumers of this data are. If you're looking to work with more traditional library environments, perhaps those that are using CONTENTdm, etc. the legacy hack-ish format might be the best. (I'm part of an initiative to revitalize the Sheet Music Consortium <http://digital.library.ucla.edu/sheetmusic/> and lots of our potential contributors are CONTENTdm users, so I think this is the direction I'm going to take that project.) But if you're wanting to talk to DCMI-style folks, the dc-ds-xml, or more likely the dc-rdf option seems more attractive. I'm afraid I'm not much help with the implementation details of dc-rdf, though. One of the DC mailing list would be, though, I suspect. There are a lot of active members there.
>
> Ick, huh? :-)
>
> Jenn
>
> ========================
> Jenn Riley
> Metadata Librarian
> Digital Library Program
> Indiana University - Bloomington
> Wells Library W501
> (812) 856-5759
> www.dlib.indiana.edu
>
> Inquiring Librarian blog: www.inquiringlibrarian.blogspot.com
>
>   

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager