Can you give some details (or references) to justify the belief that 
OAuth isn't ready yet?  (The fact that Twitter implemented it poorly 
does not seem apropos to me, that's just a critique of Twitter, right?).

I don't agree or disagree, just trying to take this from fud-ish rumor 
to facts to help me and others understand and make decisions.

Jonathan

MJ Ray wrote:
> "j.g. pawletko" wrote:
>   
>> I haven't implemented OAuth, and you may have already read this,
>> but if not: ArsTechnica wrote a critique of the Twitter OAuth
>> implementation that may be of interest.  You can find that article
>> here: http://bit.ly/c88aa7
>>     
>
> The co-op has been working on OAuth recently, including for Twitter.
> I feel the above is an accurate summary.  In short, OAuth isn't ready
> yet and it would be very disappointing if ILS-DI adopts it.
>
> What other options is ILS-DI API group considering?
>
> Hope that helps,
>