That is probably correct. England may appear as both a 110 *and* a 151 because the 110 signifies the concept for the country entity while the 151 signifies the concept for the geographic place. A subtle distinction...

Andy.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Ya'aqov Ziso
> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 11:56
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] LCSH and Linked Data
> 
> Ralph, Owen's pointing to a list where corporate (110) and geographic
> names
> (151) are mixed.
> 
> Thanks Owen, I haven't seen that the first time. I guess you got that
> mixed
> 110/151 when limiting to 'exact name'. Perhaps Andrew has a workaround.
> 
> *Ya'aqov*
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:34 AM, LeVan,Ralph <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> > If you look at the fields those names come from, I think they mean
> > England as a corporation, not England as a place.
> >
> > Ralph
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
> Behalf
> > Of
> > > Owen Stephens
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 11:28 AM
> > > To: [log in to unmask]
> > > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] LCSH and Linked Data
> > >
> > > Still digesting Andrew's response (thanks Andrew), but
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Ya'aqov Ziso <[log in to unmask]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > *Currently under id.loc.gov you will not find name authority
> > records, but
> > > > you can find them at viaf.org*.
> > > > *[YZ]*  viaf.org does not include geographic names. I just
> checked
> > there
> > > > England.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Is this not the relevant VIAF entry
> > > http://viaf.org/viaf/14299580<http://viaf.org/viaf/142995804>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Owen Stephens
> > > Owen Stephens Consulting
> > > Web: http://www.ostephens.com
> > > Email: [log in to unmask]
> >
> 
> 
> 
> --
> *ya'aqov**ZISO | **[log in to unmask] **| 856 217 3456
> 
> *