On 29 November 2011 05:05, Jonathan Rochkind <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> "hold the trademark in trust and not enforce it against any individual,
> organization, or company who chooses to promote services around Koha in New
> Well, the point of having a trademark at all is generally to enforce it
> against people who are calling something that is _not_ Koha "Koha."
> Since LibLime is accused by the community of doing exactly that, that is
> precisely what they are worried about, and want to make sure they can call
> whatever they want Koha, regardless of whether the Koha Foundation or Koha
> community thinks it is Koha. And just to make it not look quite so bald,
> they say that not only LibLime, but _everyone_ should be able to call
> whatever they want "Koha" regardless of whether the community or foundation
> believes it is Koha.
> It is not that surprising that this would not be acceptable to the Koha