++ Agreed, no reason to move it to a separate list. Just make sure you
have adequate subject lines so it doesn't get confusing and people can
delete without reading if they want.
Edward
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Jay Luker <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> +1. Keep it on the main list.
>
> --jay
>
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Kevin S. Clarke <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> But I think in the past people on this list have said they don't mind
>> the additional traffic from people planning regional stuff. It's
>> useful to keep it on the main list, too, because the other regions can
>> learn from the chatter (what works, what doesn't, etc.)
>>
>> Kevin
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Ranti Junus <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> Google Group works for planning code4lib regional-related stuff.
>>>
>>> On Dec 18, 2011 10:31 AM, "Tito Sierra" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>> What's the best way of organizing a code4lib regional without clogging the
>>>> list? Google group?
|
