You might consider the Content in RDF specification:
which describes how to do this in a generic fashion, as opposed to
stuffing it directly into a string literal.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Ethan Gruber <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> Suppose I have RDF describing an object, and I would like some fairly
> free-form human generating description about the object (let's say within
> <dcterms:description>). Is it semantically acceptable to have XHTML nested
> directly in this element or would this be considered uncouth for LOD?