On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Simon Spero <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Ethan Gruber <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Suppose I have RDF describing an object, and I would like some
>> fairly free-form human generating description about the object (let's say
>> within <dcterms:description>). Is it semantically acceptable to have XHTML
>> nested directly in this element or would this be considered uncouth for LOD?
> Free-form human generating is considered uncouth except behind closed
> doors, but XML literals are explictly provided for - see
This does assume, however, that the object is a well-formed XML
document and not just text with markup in it (although I think Ethan's
original post implies this).