Reminds me of this article, which frighteningly is now eight years old:
On 14 February 2012 06:25, Kåre Fiedler Christiansen
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> You realize, of course, that discussing the use of the word metametadata could be described as metametametadata? Which would make my post metametametametadata. At which point it all turns into silliness (which it certainly wasn't before... right? :-) ).
>> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Kurt Nordstrom
>> I got such dirty looks when I used the term "metametadata" to
>> something. ;)
>> On 02/13/2012 02:39 PM, Becky Yoose wrote:
>> > Could this conversation be described as metametadata?
>> > *runs, hides*
>> > Thanks,
>> > Becky