On May 8, 2012, at 10:17 AM, Ethan Gruber wrote:
> in. Our data is exclusively XML, so LAMP/Rails aren't really options.
^^ Really? Nobody's going to take the bait with this one?
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Nate Vack <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Ethan Gruber <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> It was recently suggested to me that a project I am working on may adopt
>>> node.js for its architecture (well, be completely re-written for
>>> I don't know anything about node.js, and have only heard of it in some
>>> passing discussions on the list. I'd like to know if anyone on code4lib
>>> has experience developing in this platform, and what their thoughts are
>>> it, positive or negative.
>> I've only played a little bit, but my take is: you'll have more parts
>> to build than with other systems. If you need persistent connections,
>> it's gonna be neat; if you don't, it's probably not worth the bother.
>> The Peepcode screencasts on Node:
>> are probably worth your time and money.