Let's assume Rule 34 holds for P. All we have to do is prove it holds for P+1 (NSFW) and bingo bango bongo, it's validated. Anyone who doesn't see the logic in that is literally worse than Hitler.

Matt McCollow
Programmer
Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship, McMaster University

On 2012-07-09, at 2:45 PM, Becky Yoose wrote:

> Why can't we do all three at once?
> 
> Becky, who is doing three major system implementations this month
> 
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Michael J. Giarlo <
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
>> I'm calling it: five more posts, tops, and we'll either have invoked
>> Godwin's Law, validated Rule 34, or found the end of the Internet.
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Roy Tennant <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> Despite the lawful and prudent endorsement of this thread by our
>>> official designee to the OCLC Off-Topic Cat Discussion Moderation
>>> Divisiion, I feel it necessary to point out that @mjgiarlo's post was
>>> in error. The K Street lobbyist does not handle kitty litter. The
>>> Congressperson the K Street lobbyist controls, does.
>>> Roy
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Suchy, Daniel <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>> This thread is now officially sanctioned.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> -OCLC Off-Topic Cat Discussion Moderation Division-
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 7/9/12 11:28 AM, "Michael J. Giarlo" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Perhaps the original poster assumed that only a federal librarian
>>>>> would work for $1/minute in the DC area?  The going rate for a K St.
>>>>> lobbyist to handle kitty-litter is at least $20/minute.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -Mike
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Joe Hourcle
>>>>> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>> On Jul 9, 2012, at 2:04 PM, Chris Fitzpatrick wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This just seems like some sort of trap. The fact that it's a
>>>>>>> craigslist ad
>>>>>>> in all caps makes me pretty sure this person is working on a
>> "librarian
>>>>>>> centpede" in their basement.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> If that were the case, I think they'd also accept applicants from the
>>>>>> Folger Shakespeare Library, which may actually be closer.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> So, the real question is why it must specifically be federal employee
>>>>>> librarians.  (and I don't know of any librarians with TS/SCI/Poly ...
>>>>>> but I *have* heard that some of the archivists at the National
>> Archives
>>>>>> do, but that was a 'my son is fed up with his job' story from a
>>>>>> librarian
>>>>>> at my local public branch)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -Joe
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Jul 9, 2012 7:56 PM, "Simon Spero" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Jul 9, 2012 1:27 PM, "Joshua Gomez" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> WE NEED A CAT LOVER WHO IS ALSO A FEDERAL EMPLOYEE TO DO THIS JOB!
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Must have active TS/SCI clearance with FS Poly.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> All applicants must complete the attached 20 page KSA.
>>>>>>>> 
>>