LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for NDSA-STANDARDS Archives


NDSA-STANDARDS Archives

NDSA-STANDARDS Archives


NDSA-STANDARDS@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NDSA-STANDARDS Home

NDSA-STANDARDS Home

NDSA-STANDARDS  July 2012, Week 3

NDSA-STANDARDS July 2012, Week 3

Subject:

Re: text for: Please take the NDSA Digital Preservation Staffing Survey

From:

John Spencer <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

The NDSA Standards working group list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:43:04 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (194 lines)

Thanks Andrea, I'll do that. I won't be deviating significantly from the text you created, just changing a couple of words. 

Appreciate your help and feedback!

John

On Jul 19, 2012, at 10:23 AM, Goethals, Andrea wrote:

> Sorry I should have been clearer. The document I attached is the original text - I didn't change it. But you can change the text to fit your audience.
> 
> Andrea
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: The NDSA Standards working group list [mailto:NDSA-
>> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Spencer
>> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 11:20 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [NDSA-STANDARDS] text for: Please take the NDSA Digital
>> Preservation Staffing Survey
>> 
>> So to further clarify, we're fine with me tweaking that part? I looked
>> at the .doc you sent and I'm comfortable with the term "organization" -
>> except for the 3rd and last paragraph that still refer to
>> "institution". If everyone is fine with me changing those 2 paragraphs
>> I'll do that and send it out. I'm thinking I'll probably use the DDEX
>> reflector to hit labels around the world, along with our US clients.
>> 
>> Glad to hear we've already got responses!! Maybe we did something
>> right!! I just want to make sure i'm not coloring outside the lines...
>> 
>> John
>> 
>> On Jul 19, 2012, at 10:07 AM, Goethals, Andrea wrote:
>> 
>>> That makes sense to me. The text is only meant to be a guideline. I'm
>> attaching a DOC version of the text because it gets un-HTMLized if I
>> send the text directly through the NDSA list. You should be able to
>> copy and paste the text in the attached document and then modify as
>> needed.
>>> 
>>> BTW we have 5 responses so far!
>>> 
>>> Andrea
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: The NDSA Standards working group list [mailto:NDSA-
>>>> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Spencer
>>>> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 11:05 AM
>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>> Subject: Re: [NDSA-STANDARDS] text for: Please take the NDSA Digital
>>>> Preservation Staffing Survey
>>>> 
>>>> Andrea,
>>>> 
>>>> I have only one question - I plan to submit this to a number of
>> music
>>>> labels, and they might be put off by the word "institution"....
>>>> 
>>>> Would it be OK with the group if I added "or company" to the folks
>> that
>>>> I'm going to try and get submissions from?
>>>> 
>>>> Any feedback is welcome, I'd like to push it out but I may have a
>> low
>>>> response if the recipients think this is an "institutional only"
>>>> survey.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> John
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Jul 18, 2012, at 3:35 PM, Goethals, Andrea wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I think the survey is ready to be announced. Here's the text to use
>>>> for the announcement (filling in your name at the bottom). Unless
>>>> anyone sees anything glaringly wrong in this text we can start
>>>> announcing it using our compiled list at
>>>> 
>> http://www.loc.gov/extranet/wiki/osi/ndiip/ndsa/index.php?title=List_of
>>>> _places/people_we_want_to_receive_the_survey
>>>>> 
>>>>> Andrea
>>>>> 
>>>>> ---------------------------
>>>>> Organizations establishing or scaling up digital preservation
>>>> programs are faced with many decisions. How many staff do we need?
>> What
>>>> types of positions are needed? What skills, education and experience
>>>> should we be looking for? Should we hire new staff or retrain
>> existing
>>>> staff? What functions should be scoped as part of the program? What
>>>> should be provided by other parts of the organization, outsourced or
>>>> provided through collaboration with other organizations?
>>>>> 
>>>>> The National Digital Stewardship
>>>> Alliance<http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/ndsa/> (NDSA) Standards
>> &
>>>> Practices Working
>>>> 
>> Group<http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/ndsa/working_groups/standards.
>>>> html> is conducting a survey of organizations currently responsible
>> for
>>>> digital preservation to gain insight into how organizations
>> worldwide
>>>> are addressing these staffing, scoping and organizational questions.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Only one response should be submitted per institution. The survey
>>>> will close on August 17, 2012.
>>>>> 
>>>>> To begin click on this link:    Start the
>>>> survey<https://harvard.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_bDE8UQ1rK17JHqk>
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please email any questions to [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> with
>>>> the subject line Staffing Survey.
>>>>> 
>>>>> We will make our best effort to protect your individual survey
>>>> responses so that no one will be able to connect your responses with
>>>> you or your organization. Any personal information that could
>> identify
>>>> you or your organization will be removed or changed before results
>> are
>>>> made public. We will combine your responses with the responses of
>>>> others and make the aggregated results public, and preserve the
>>>> anonymous data long-term for research purposes.
>>>>> 
>>>>> If you would like to plan your answers before filling out the
>> online
>>>> survey, you can access the survey
>>>> 
>> worksheet<http://hul.harvard.edu/ois/digpres/docs/DP_Survey_Working_Cop
>>>> y.docx>.  After you take the survey, if you would like a copy of
>> your
>>>> institution's responses, please send the request to
>>>> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> with the subject line Staffing
>> Survey
>>>> and indicate in the email your institution and the IP address from
>>>> which you submitted the survey.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>> [YOUR NAME], on behalf of the Standards & Practices WG, NDSA
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ############################
>>>>> 
>>>>> To unsubscribe from the NDSA-STANDARDS list:
>>>>> write to: mailto:NDSA-STANDARDS-SIGNOFF-
>>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>>> or click the following link:
>>>>> http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/scripts/wa-
>>>> DIGITAL.exe?SUBED1=NDSA-STANDARDS&A=1
>>>> 
>>>> ############################
>>>> 
>>>> To unsubscribe from the NDSA-STANDARDS list:
>>>> write to: mailto:NDSA-STANDARDS-SIGNOFF-
>>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>> or click the following link:
>>>> http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/scripts/wa-
>> DIGITAL.exe?SUBED1=NDSA-
>>>> STANDARDS&A=1
>>> 
>>> ############################
>>> 
>>> To unsubscribe from the NDSA-STANDARDS list:
>>> write to: mailto:NDSA-STANDARDS-SIGNOFF-
>> [log in to unmask]
>>> or click the following link:
>>> http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/scripts/wa-
>> DIGITAL.exe?SUBED1=NDSA-STANDARDS&A=1
>>> <DP_Staffing_Survey_Announcement.doc>
>> 
>> ############################
>> 
>> To unsubscribe from the NDSA-STANDARDS list:
>> write to: mailto:NDSA-STANDARDS-SIGNOFF-
>> [log in to unmask]
>> or click the following link:
>> http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/scripts/wa-DIGITAL.exe?SUBED1=NDSA-
>> STANDARDS&A=1
> 
> ############################
> 
> To unsubscribe from the NDSA-STANDARDS list:
> write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
> or click the following link:
> http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/scripts/wa-DIGITAL.exe?SUBED1=NDSA-STANDARDS&A=1

############################

To unsubscribe from the NDSA-STANDARDS list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://list.digitalpreservation.gov/scripts/wa-DIGITAL.exe?SUBED1=NDSA-STANDARDS&A=1

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
September 2020
August 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
July 2019
May 2019
March 2019
October 2018
May 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014, Week 3
March 2014, Week 2
March 2014, Week 1
March 2014
February 2014, Week 4
February 2014, Week 3
February 2014, Week 2
February 2014, Week 1
January 2014, Week 4
January 2014, Week 1
December 2013, Week 3
December 2013, Week 2
December 2013, Week 1
November 2013, Week 3
November 2013, Week 2
November 2013, Week 1
October 2013, Week 5
October 2013, Week 3
September 2013, Week 3
September 2013, Week 2
August 2013, Week 5
August 2013, Week 2
August 2013, Week 1
July 2013, Week 3
July 2013, Week 2
July 2013, Week 1
June 2013, Week 4
June 2013, Week 2
May 2013, Week 4
May 2013, Week 3
April 2013, Week 4
April 2013, Week 1
March 2013, Week 4
March 2013, Week 3
March 2013, Week 2
February 2013, Week 4
February 2013, Week 2
January 2013, Week 5
January 2013, Week 4
January 2013, Week 3
January 2013, Week 2
December 2012, Week 3
December 2012, Week 2
December 2012, Week 1
November 2012, Week 5
November 2012, Week 4
November 2012, Week 3
November 2012, Week 2
October 2012, Week 5
October 2012, Week 4
October 2012, Week 1
September 2012, Week 4
September 2012, Week 3
September 2012, Week 2
September 2012, Week 1
August 2012, Week 5
August 2012, Week 3
August 2012, Week 2
August 2012, Week 1
July 2012, Week 5
July 2012, Week 4
July 2012, Week 3
June 2012, Week 3
June 2012, Week 2
May 2012, Week 5
May 2012, Week 4
May 2012, Week 3
May 2012, Week 2
May 2012, Week 1
April 2012, Week 4
April 2012, Week 3
April 2012, Week 2
April 2012, Week 1
March 2012, Week 5
March 2012, Week 3
March 2012, Week 2
March 2012, Week 1
February 2012, Week 4
February 2012, Week 3
February 2012, Week 1
January 2012, Week 5
January 2012, Week 3
January 2012, Week 2
January 2012, Week 1
December 2011, Week 5
December 2011, Week 4
December 2011, Week 3
December 2011, Week 2
December 2011, Week 1
November 2011, Week 5
November 2011, Week 3
November 2011, Week 2
November 2011, Week 1
October 2011, Week 4
October 2011, Week 3
October 2011, Week 1
September 2011, Week 4
September 2011, Week 3
September 2011, Week 2
September 2011, Week 1
August 2011, Week 2
August 2011, Week 1
July 2011, Week 4
July 2011, Week 2
July 2011, Week 1
June 2011, Week 3
June 2011, Week 2
June 2011, Week 1
May 2011, Week 1
April 2011, Week 4
April 2011, Week 1
March 2011, Week 5
March 2011, Week 4
March 2011, Week 2
March 2011, Week 1
February 2011, Week 4
February 2011, Week 2
February 2011, Week 1
January 2011, Week 4
January 2011, Week 3
January 2011, Week 2
January 2011, Week 1
December 2010, Week 3
December 2010, Week 1
November 2010, Week 4
November 2010, Week 3
November 2010, Week 2
October 2010, Week 2
September 2010, Week 5
September 2010, Week 3
September 2010, Week 2
September 2010, Week 1
August 2010, Week 5

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager