LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  August 2012

CODE4LIB August 2012

Subject:

Re: Maker Spaces and Academic Libraries

From:

Edward Iglesias <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 28 Aug 2012 08:23:06 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (169 lines)

This has turned into quite a discussion.  I think the whole issue of
liability is a bit overstated.  A 3D printer is somewhere between a toaster
oven and a xerox machine in terms of dangerousness.  Yes, a student might
burn themselves on hot plastic or the printing surface but they might get a
worse burn from a latte.

I really like Lisa's idea of the library becoming a nexus point where
students can access other resources as needed.  Maybe a chop saw in the
library is a bit much but if a student wants to use one for his or her
course work why not?  There are already tool libraries.  We have a similar
issue on our campus where there are 3D printers but only in the Engineering
department.  Meanwhile we have students in all disciplines doing hobby
robotics, our graphic design department is teaching 3D rendering and art
students are starting to ask about how they can take a new approach to
sculpture.


Edward Iglesias


On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 3:52 AM, Cary Gordon <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> One note on this. All of the commercial printers I have seen from the
> plastic shooters to water cutters that can turn out a great car wheel
> have been enclosed boxes with safety systems. They are orders of
> magnitude safer than, say, a bunsen burner. Sure, these can be
> defeated by someone with intent to do harm to themselves or others,
> but I have seen some pretty dangerous books, as well, and I am not
> talking about intellectual content.
>
> Cary
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Joe Hourcle
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > On Aug 27, 2012, at 9:44 AM, BWS Johnson wrote:
> >
> >> Salvete!
> >>
> >>     Can't. Resist. Bait. Batman.
> >>
> >>
> >>> Can anyone on the list help clarify for me why, in an academic setting,
> >>> this kind of equipment and facility isn't part of a laboratory in an
> >>> academic department?
> >>>
> >>
> >>     I'd say that I hate to play devil's advocate, but that would be a
> patent misrepresentation of material fact.
> >>
> >>     Conversely, could you please tell us why you think it *shouldn't*
> be at the Library?
> >
> >
> > I can think of one reason they shouldn't be *anywhere*:  liability.
> >
> > When I was working on my undergrad, in civil engineering, the
> university's science and engineering school had their own machine shop.
> >
> > Officially, you were only supposed to use it if you were a grad student,
> or supervised by a grad student.
> >
> > Yet, there were a number of us (the undergrad population) who had more
> experience than the grad students.  (I had done a couple years of shop
> class during high school, one of the other students had learned from his
> father who worked in the trade, another was going back to school after
> having been a professional machinist for years,  etc.).
> >
> > So well, I know at least two of us would go down and use the shop
> without supervision.  (and in a few cases, all alone, which is another
> violation when you're working at 1am and there's no one to call for medical
> assistance should something go really, really wrong).
> >
> > And in some cases, we'd teach the grad students who were doing stuff
> wrong (trying to take off too much material in a pass, using the incorrect
> tools, etc.  But I made just as many mistakes.  (when you're in a true
> machine shop, and there's two different blades for the bandsaw with
> different TPI, it's not that one's for metal and one's for wood ... as they
> don't do wood cutting there ... but I must've broken and re-welded the
> blade a half dozen times and gone through a quart of cutting fluid to make
> only a few cuts, as I didn't realize that I should've been using the lower
> TPI blade for cutting aluminum)
> >
> >
> > I admit I don't know enough about these 'maker spaces' ... I assume
> there'd have to be some training / certification before using the
> equipment.  The other option would be to treat it more like a print shop,
> where someone drops off their item to be printed, and then comes back to
> pick it up after the job's been run.
> >
> > And it's possible that you're using less dangerous equipment.  (eg, when
> in high school, my senior year we got a new principal who required that all
> teachers wear ties ... including the shop teachers.  Have you ever seen
> what happens when a tie gets caught in a lathe or a printing press?  He's
> lucky the teachers were experienced, as a simple mistake could've killed
> them)
> >
> > But even something as simple as a polishing/grinding wheel could be a
> hazard to both the person using it and anyone around them.  (I remember one
> of my high school shop teachers not happy that I was so aggressive when
> grinding down some steel, as I was spraying sparks near his desk ... which
> could've started a fire)
> >
> > ... so the whole issue of making sure that no one gets injured / killed
> / damages others is one of the liability issues, but I also remember when I
> worked for the university computer lab, we had a scanner that you could
> sign up to use.  One day, one of the university police saw what one of the
> students was doing, and insisted that we were allowing students to make
> fake IDs.  (the student in question had scanned in a CD cover, which was a
> distorted drivers license looking thing ... if he was trying to make a fake
> ID, you'd think he'd have started from a genuine ID card)
> >
> > As we've now got people who are printing gun receivers, there's a real
> possibility that people could be printing stuff that might be in violation
> of the law.  (I won't get into the issue of if it's a stupid law or not ...
> this is something the legal department needs to weigh in on).  And
> conversely, if you're a public institution and you censor what people are
> allowed to make, then you get into first amendment issues.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > On a completely unrelated note, when I first saw the question about
> libraries & maker spaces, I was thinking in the context of public
> libraries, and thought the idea was pretty strange.  I see a much better
> fit for academic libraries, but I'm still not 100% sold on it.  In part, I
> know that it's already possible to get a lot of stuff 'made' at most
> universities, but you risk treading on certain trade's toes, which could
> piss off the unions.  Eg, we had a sign shop who had some CNC cutters for
> sheet goods (this was the mid 1990s), carpenters and such under the
> building maintenance, large scale printing and book binding through the
> university graphics department (they later outsourced the larger jobs, got
> rid of the binding equipment).
> >
> > I could see the equipment being of use to these groups, but I don't know
> that they'd be happy if their lack of control over being able to make money
> by charging for their services would go over well.
> >
> > I would assume that if you were to move forward with this, that you'd
> need to identify the groups that could make use of it, how it might affect
> other groups (eg, those people that charged for performing these services),
> and try to get buy-in from all communities.  You don't need a union picket
> line popping up because they think you're trying to take their jobs.*
> >
> > -Joe
> >
> >
> > * I'm generally pro-union, but I'm still bitter about an incident where
> I had a couple of hours of my time wasted at the San Francisco Moscone
> Center, as a I needed our crate to pack up monitors, and I got it 1/2 way
> out of their storage area before someone noticed me ... and he spent more
> time giving me a lecture about how that was someone else's job (as if my
> intention was union busting), when he could've just said they wanted to get
> the carpet up first before rolling crates around ... then I had to sit
> around for another hour, because he insisted on rolling my crate all the
> way back to where it was ... and finally, he noticed me getting annoyed, so
> he called in someone to deliver the crate, so they brought in someone with
> a forklift to move it the 30-odd yards when it had its own damned wheels
> and if I'd have gone under the curtain, it would've only had to go 5 yards)
> >
> >
> > [and um ... insert standard disclaimer about how I'm not speaking for my
> employer, etc.]
>
>
>
> --
> Cary Gordon
> The Cherry Hill Company
> http://chillco.com
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager