Regardless of whether or not you enter this, Michael, every vote from the Diebold-o-tron in the t-shirt election will go towards this design.

Mark my words.

-Ross.

On Aug 15, 2012, at 9:16 AM, Doran, Michael D wrote:

>> Second the motion to stop beating this dead horse.
> 
> 
> 
> Dang, and I was already working on this 2013 conference t-shirt design...
> 
> 
> 
> [cid:[log in to unmask]]
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
> 
>> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> 
>> Friscia, Michael
> 
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 7:46 AM
> 
>> To: [log in to unmask]
> 
>> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] It's all job postings!
> 
>> 
> 
>> Second the motion to stop beating this dead horse.
> 
>> 
> 
>> ___________________________________________
> 
>> Michael Friscia
> 
>> Manager, Digital Library & Programming Services
> 
>> 
> 
>> Yale University Library
> 
>> (203) 432-1856
> 
>> 
> 
>> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
> 
>> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]]<mailto:[mailto:[log in to unmask]]> On Behalf Of
> 
>> Carol Bean
> 
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 8:43 AM
> 
>> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> 
>> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] It's all job postings!
> 
>> 
> 
>> No.
> 
>> 
> 
>> Just no. Vote taken. Preferences noted. Done.
> 
>> 
> 
>> Carol
> 
>> 
> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> 
> 
>> On Aug 15, 2012, at 4:50 AM, Graham Triggs <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
> 
>> wrote:
> 
>> 
> 
>>> On 6 August 2012 13:19, Ed Summers <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> 
>>>> 150 people responded about whether jobs.code4lib.org posting should
> 
>>>> come to the discussion list:
> 
>>>> 
> 
>>>>   yes: 132
> 
>>>>   no: 10
> 
>>>>   who cares: 8
> 
>>>> 
> 
>>>> 93% in support or agnostic seems to be a good indicator that the
> 
>>>> postings should continue to come to the list for now.
> 
>>> 
> 
>>> I'm not entirely convinced about that assessment. I quite readily
> 
>>> agree that the jobs should be posted to *a* mailing list, I'm not so
> 
>>> sure that it should be this mailing list.
> 
>>> 
> 
>>> It's been discussed about filtering the jobs sent to the list, but I
> 
>>> already filter the code4lib mailing list into a tag. It's been a bit
> 
>>> of a faff, but I've subdivided the filtering so that I can get the
> 
>>> messages sent from jobs@... to go to a different tag. But then Ed
> 
>>> replied to one, so now it appears in both tags, and because I'm using
> 
>>> Gmail, it takes the whole thread with it.
> 
>>> 
> 
>>> So filtering really isn't a solution.
> 
>>> 
> 
>>> Rather than just asking whether jobs should come to this mailing list,
> 
>>> maybe we can ask whether a separate mailing list should be set up,
> 
>>> specifically for jobs. The two mailing lists could be cross promoted
> 
>>> (e.g. a standard footer), and people can choose whether they want or
> 
>>> don't want to receive them. And we can still have
> 
>>> discussions/follow-ups about those jobs on that mailing list.
> 
>>> 
> 
>>> Even though the vast majority of the postings aren't applicable to me,
> 
>>> I would probably still sign up to a separate jobs mailing list as it
> 
>>> is of interest - but I would at least then be able to keep that
> 
>>> separate from the main discussions, which is something I can't
> 
>>> effectively do right now.
> 
>>> 
> 
>>> G