On Nov 1, 2012, at 6:56 PM, Kam Woods wrote:

> Apologies, everyone (and especially Bohyun). You may still want to consider
> pointing people to foss4lib as a useful resource, but amend it with the
> following statement:
> 
> "Free and open source tools may not be the best tools. You might not even
> NEED software to handle whatever problem you have. Please consider
> contacting [log in to unmask] for further insight."

Oh ... sure... just get me in trouble ...

We're supposed to use our 'OneNASA' e-mail address, so you'd have to change
it to

	[log in to unmask]

... and I said that in part as I've been in the past a beta tester for 
BareBones's BBEdit.  If you're not doing HTML work, TextWrangler will
probably do what you need (which is ... whatever the 'free' is that
isn't 'libre')

And there's plenty of other good software out there that isn't free,
and there's lots of free software out there that's crap (some of which
I might've been involved with).


> Personally, I was unaware of either of these issues. It's a good thing I
> came here today for some edification.

Yes.  'smart' whiteboards are over priced crap.  I hope I've educated
everyone today.

-Joe