LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  November 2012

CODE4LIB November 2012

Subject:

Re: tech vs. nursing

From:

Chris Fitzpatrick <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:06:07 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (174 lines)

Ah, so I am a bit delusional. I really need to cut back on these bath
salts....(but at least I'm not ALA delusional...$90 for a PDF of librarian
salary statistics...really? )

Thinking about this, I guess things have changed quite a bit and I hadn't
realized it...at my first 3 library/archive jobs as a student, I was the
only man in the departments I was working in. But recently, it seems women
are making up more of the library staff the are a) retiring, b) being laid
off or forced out, or c) being put into marginalized middle management
positions (which usually leads to scenario b ) . I don't think this is some
sort of evil plan that is being hatch in some boardroom somewhere...but it
does seem to be happening, right?

But, this leads into another trend I've noticed... recent MLIS graduates
are constantly lamenting the lack of jobs...meanwhile this list is flooded
with jobs. It's a really odd disconnect.  MLIS programs probably have a
good mix of genders (or has that changed too?), so maybe being more active
with current MLIS students will not only get more women in code4lib but
also get more women working in the newer technology departments?




On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> ALA does salary surveys every year. This is from the ALA-APA toolkit [1]:
>
> "Pay inequity also exists within librarianship. The Association of
> Research Libraries, in its Annual Salary Survey
> 2005-6, reported that the average salary for male academic librarians in
> member libraries was $63,984, while
> the average for female academic librarians was $61,083.5
>
> Library Journal reported that new library school graduates finally crossed
> the $40,000 mark as an average salary,
> but the gender split had women below that point with $39,587 and men at
> $42,143."
>
> And there's more if you go through the literature.
>
> kc
>
> [1] http://ala-apa.org/improving-**salariesstatus/resources/ala-**
> apa-librarian-and-library-**worker-salary-surveys/<http://ala-apa.org/improving-salariesstatus/resources/ala-apa-librarian-and-library-worker-salary-surveys/>
>
>
> On 11/29/12 1:19 PM, Chris Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
>> Hm. This all has been a long and really interesting conversation...but I
>> gotta ask if  men really outweigh women in the higher paying library jobs
>> as much as they do in banks and K-12? I guess it depends on the definition
>> of "tech" vs. "non-tech" jobs in the library setting, which I'll leave to
>> that other email tread...but since I started working in libraries, 3 of my
>> last 5 managers (hi, Bess!) were women. I always thought one of the best
>> things about working at libraries was that there are way more women
>> working
>> in higher positions than there are in most private for-profit companies.
>>   And I'd be willing to bet my life savings that libraries have
>> a significantly higher percentage of women executives than Fourtune 500
>> companies. But maybe I'm delusional about this? I don't have any figures
>> or
>> anything...
>>
>> What I have noticed is that academic libraries have been trying harder to
>> emulate the Valley and the general tech field. Not only is "Thinking Like
>> A
>> Startup" a mantra, but libraries are flocking to flashier cutting edge
>> technologies. This is probably not a bad thing, but communities like
>> Rails,
>> Drupal, Django, Hadoop, and Node are all overloaded with particular
>> chromosome. So maybe a side-effect is that we're now emulating some of
>> their bad habits along with the good ones?
>>
>> Another thing that Karen Coyle's comments about "coders" vs. "helpers"
>> made
>> me think of is that academic libraries tend to be reorganizing their
>>   departments in kinda interesting ways. There now seems to be things like
>> "Metadata" or "Systems" groups that are distinct from "Digital Repository"
>> or "Applications" groups. Catalogers and the people who work on the ILS
>> are
>> often completely segregated from the people who work on the new flashy
>> grant-funded projects. The former, it kinda seems to me, tends to have
>> more
>> women members while the latter is often lacking. Code4Lib draws mostly
>> from
>> people working in these new-ish groups, which the others get sent to
>> things
>> like ALA...maybe we can significantly improve our ratio by trying to
>> involve and interact more with our colleagues sitting on the other side of
>> the cubical partition? Although the last time I did that I learned the
>> hard
>> way why turning off the Zebra index is a bad idea, so maybe on second
>> thought it's better if we don't get in each other's hair....
>>
>> best,fitz.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Bess Sadler <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  The challenges around getting women into male-dominated professions is a
>>> little different from the challenges of getting men into women-dominated
>>> professions. For one thing, professions that are female-dominated are
>>> notoriously low-paying and low-status (think K-12 teachers, nursing,
>>> social
>>> workers, etc). These professions do have major recruiting problems,
>>> largely
>>> because they are low-paying, often considered to be undesirable, and they
>>> have high levels of stress burnout. When men choose to enter these
>>> fields,
>>> they often are promoted more quickly and paid more than women. There are
>>> many professions where this is true. Women outnumber men as K-12
>>> teachers,
>>> but men outnumber women as K-12 principals and school superintendents.
>>> Women make up the majority of bank tellers, but men make up the majority
>>> of
>>> bank managers. Women make up the majority of librarians, but men make up
>>> the majority of the higher-paying technology jobs in libraries. Sensing a
>>> pattern yet? THAT is what we a!
>>>   re trying to disrupt.
>>>
>>> Don't get me wrong, getting more men into nursing is a good thing too!
>>> The
>>> fact that men are less likely to put up with low wages, bad working
>>> conditions, or disrespectful colleagues can work in everyone's favor, and
>>> the field of nursing in particular has faced such problems with
>>> recruiting
>>> that they are trying to undergo a major cultural shift. Male nurses have
>>> been a part of that. Obviously I am not a nurse, but I do have a close
>>> relative who authored a study on this subject for a nursing school, so I
>>> have heard a bit about it.
>>>
>>> I highly recommend the book "Women Don't Ask" (
>>> http://www.womendontask.com),
>>> which is a great book for anyone who wants to know more about effective
>>> negotiating. (Read it before your next salary negotiation!) The book
>>> discusses why men tend to ask for better treatment, better salaries, more
>>> opportunities, etc, while women more often accept whatever they are
>>> given.
>>> This is learned behavior that we can learn to change, though. I think a
>>> place like code4lib, where there is so much opportunity to speak up or
>>> spark initiatives without any hierarchy or bureaucracy getting in the
>>> way,
>>> can be a fertile ground for women who want to develop their negotiation
>>> and
>>> leadership skills, as well as their technical capacity. My entire career
>>> has been shaped around stuff I learned in code4lib, and only some of it
>>> was
>>> about code.
>>>
>>> Bess
>>>
>>> On Nov 27, 2012, at 7:56 AM, "Huwig,Steve" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm just the peanut gallery (having never attended Code4Lib) but it
>>>
>>>> seems to me that a useful analogue to programming/tech conferences --
>>>> which Code4Lib surely is -- would be conferences aimed at professional
>>>> nurses.
>>>>
>>>> Do those conference organizers take measures to increase the number of
>>>> male attendees? If so, what do they do?
>>>>
>>>> Just throwing ideas out there,
>>>> Steve Huwig
>>>>
>>>
> --
> Karen Coyle
> [log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net
> ph: 1-510-540-7596
> m: 1-510-435-8234
> skype: kcoylenet
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager