I prefer the tone and language in your version.
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I did a somewhat radical edit of the policy. To me it sounded heavy-handed,
> and I didn't think that we needed such in our community. I also want to
> distinguish between "bloopers" that need correction and active harassment. A
> lot of discriminatory language is unconscious but still should be gently
> corrected. 
> I also don't think that these are "rules" -- a policy is a policy, and I
> think rules is too strong a term.
> Because of the amount that I changed (and because I really wasn't sure what
> would happen when I hit "save") these changes are still in my "fork":
> Let me know if I should commit it (and I'm assuming that's just a matter of
> hitting the "commit" button).
>  It's from the 90's, but http://kcoyle.net/howhard.html has many examples
> Karen Coyle
> [log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net
> ph: 1-510-540-7596
> m: 1-510-435-8234
> skype: kcoylenet
The Cherry Hill Company