That page was mostly for me to keep track of upgrades, especially with regards to plugins. Although most of the major upgrades still haven't happened, I don't know that that page is entirely up-to-date.
Cary contacted me about working on the Drupal upgrade, and I'll work with him shortly on it, I'm pretty busy this week.
I don't know that it's a great task list for others to work from. There's many more content/page maintenance things that aren't on there.
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Shaun Ellis
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 7:07 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [CODE4LIB] Mentorship Program
I agree that we should encourage women to step up and mentor other women at Code4Lib. I also see the pairing of women mentors with women mentees as fitting into an overall mentorship program, and I would be interested in collaborating with you and others to help frame it out.
I don't think it needs to be very formal, but it would be important to give some structure to it so folks know what they are getting into, how to make sure everyone meets their goals, and measure the effectiveness of the program in terms of meeting code4lib goals (such as increasing diversity, getting more volunteer help, etc.). We can start a wikipage to start to flesh this out, unless folks would like to use a different forum.
In addition to the RailsBridge workshop, I was thinking that Code4Lib community projects would be a great way to both learn and recruit future volunteers. I was also trying to find the list of maintenance projects wiki page that someone (Jonathan?) was referring to as being top priorities for Code4Lib. Is this it?
On 12/5/12 3:57 PM, Rosalyn Metz wrote:
> So rather than focusing on statistics and math, I'd like to steer the
> conversation in a different direction. Let's say Ross is right and
> more women chose to take the survey based on the topic -- maybe that's
> a way to get women involved in Code4Lib.
> Karen had the idea of creating a women Code4Lib IRC channel, maybe
> that can be a place to start. Or maybe we have a few women that are
> willing to step up and be a Code4Lib mentor to other women -- similar
> to what we do for the new member event at the conference. I'd even be
> willing to step up and organize that if people like the idea.
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:00 PM, stuart yeates <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
>> On 06/12/12 09:05, Sara Amato wrote:
>>> I'd been staying out of this discussion, but the thought occurs to
>>> me that someone with access to the list of subscribers might run
>>> that against a list of traditional boy/girl names, and be able to make some guesses....
>> That idea runs into problems both with non-western names (there is
>> more than one kind of diversity) and those people whose experience of
>> gender in the workplace have led them to use non-gender-specific identifiers.
>> Stuart Yeates
>> Library Technology Services
Shaun D. Ellis
Digital Library Interface Developer
Firestone Library, Princeton University
voice: 609.258.1698 | [log in to unmask]