Thanks, I'll try to rmember -- when we've finished -- I suspect we have 
a ways to go.

kc

On 12/3/12 6:08 AM, Andreas Orphanides wrote:
> Karen, you should send this back to the Geek Feminism folks -- I am sure
> they'd be interested in seeing your edits, and they also like to report on
> orgs that have implemented such policies in general.
>
> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Cary Gordon <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> I prefer the tone and language in your version.
>>
>> kcoyle++
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> I did a somewhat radical edit of the policy. To me it sounded
>> heavy-handed,
>>> and I didn't think that we needed such in our community. I also want to
>>> distinguish between "bloopers" that need correction and active
>> harassment. A
>>> lot of discriminatory language is unconscious but still should be gently
>>> corrected. [1]
>>>
>>> I also don't think that these are "rules" -- a policy is a policy, and I
>>> think rules is too strong a term.
>>>
>>> Because of the amount that I changed (and because I really wasn't sure
>> what
>>> would happen when I hit "save") these changes are still in my "fork":
>>>
>>> https://github.com/kcoyle/antiharassment-policy
>>>
>>> Let me know if I should commit it (and I'm assuming that's just a matter
>> of
>>> hitting the "commit" button).
>>>
>>> kc
>>>
>>> [1] It's from the 90's, but http://kcoyle.net/howhard.html has many
>> examples
>>> --
>>> Karen Coyle
>>> [log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net
>>> ph: 1-510-540-7596
>>> m: 1-510-435-8234
>>> skype: kcoylenet
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cary Gordon
>> The Cherry Hill Company
>> http://chillco.com
>>

-- 
Karen Coyle
[log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet