On 18/12/12 10:20, Kyle Banerjee wrote:
> Howdy all,
> Just wondering who might be willing to share what kind of stats they
> produce to justify their continued existence? Of course we do the normal
> (web activity, items and metadata records created, stuff scanned, etc), but
> I'm trying to wrap my mind around ways to describe work where there's not a
> built in assumption that more is better.
I recently gave a seven minute rant at NDF about what statistics we
aren't collecting. The video requires silverlight, alas:
page, 'Lightning talks Session 2')
Capsule summary: we claim to value user engagement. Making that claim
and then failing to attempt to measure it is unprofessional.
Library Technology Services http://www.victoria.ac.nz/library/