LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  January 2013

CODE4LIB January 2013

Subject:

Re: project management system

From:

Alisak Sanavongsay <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 14 Jan 2013 13:55:32 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (198 lines)

When we first started looking for a project management system, we used this list on wikipedia ==> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_project_management_software 

Regards,
Alisak.

Alisak Sanavongsay  Digital Assets Programmer  http://library.ucmerced.edu  209.201.9073  [log in to unmask]





On Jan 14, 2013, at 1:07 PM, P Williams <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> Good thread!  I've captured this list (so far) and some of the comments in
> the wiki <http://wiki.code4lib.org/index.php/ProjectManagement>.  Feel free
> to add, edit or delete.
> 
> I like Trac [http://trac.edgewall.org/] for project life-cyle tracking.  It
> ties together issue tracking, documentation wiki, and source code browsing.
> 
> Tricia
> 
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Jason Casden <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
>> We have been using Trello[1] for several projects and so far it's been
>> getting rave reviews all around. We've used Basecamp quite a bit and it's
>> an excellent project communication tool, but it sometimes fell a little
>> short when it came to the ticket-y use cases--specifically, planning and
>> discussion around smaller chunks of work could be difficult. Trello
>> provides a clean interface that solves the many of our more pressing issues
>> for smaller projects, including:
>> 
>> 1) Feature-specific discussion and prioritization.
>> 2) Simple bug tracking.
>> 3) Recording actionable output of meetings to improve continuity between
>> planning sessions as well as to easily document a common understanding of
>> project goals.
>> 4) Killing code block by structuring the project as a pipeline of
>> clearly-defined tasks.
>> 5) Providing a place where any project member's random ideas can be
>> recorded before they're forgotten.
>> 6) Encouraging open debate outside of meetings.
>> 7) Providing a nice one-handed mobile interface for our colleagues with
>> newborns.
>> 
>> We've found that the system is intuitive both for very-technical and
>> less-technical colleagues and has helped to reduce the cognitive load
>> associated with keeping project history in memory. We have also been using
>> Google Docs for document management and GitHub for code management, but
>> haven't yet tried integrating Trello with GitHub[2][3]. I love the limits
>> the Trello developers have embraced, but it will sometimes come up short
>> when compared to some more complex project management systems (e.g. time
>> tracking, elevated project manager privileges, scheduling and chart
>> generation, document management). The current version is "free forever"[4],
>> although I think there are plans to offer a paid package with additional
>> features.
>> 
>> Jason
>> 
>> [1] https://trello.com/
>> [2] https://github.com/zanker/github-trello
>> [3] https://zapier.com/zapbook/github/trello/
>> [4] https://trello.com/privacy
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Cary Gordon <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Jira, which we use for major projects, is not open source. Atlassian
>>> does provide Jira and Confluence — their wiki tool — free of charge to
>>> open source projects.
>>> 
>>> Jira is a big hammer, and to get the most out of it, you need someone
>>> to devote a significant amount of time to configuring and maintaining
>>> it. While it is usable out of the box, it is not any better in that
>>> form than Redmine or myriad other, lighter weight and easier to manage
>>> alternatives.
>>> 
>>> Cary
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Kaile Zhu <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>> We can keep adding to the list.  Since there are so many choices,  I
>> see
>>> the strong reason to use open source software.  Here is my
>> recommendation:
>>> Jira (project management/bug reporting system used by professional
>> software
>>> development companies, like apache.org), spiceworks, etc.  - Kelly
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
>> Of
>>> Mau, Trish
>>>> Sent: 2013年1月14日 13:53
>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] project management system
>>>> 
>>>> I also like Basecamp but for really simple projects Minigroup might do
>>> the job: https://minigroup.com/. It's a hosted solution with plans
>>> starting at $3/year. There's no ticketing system or whiteboards, but you
>>> can communicate with your team, create and assign tasks, and post
>>> events/deadlines.
>>>> 
>>>> Trish
>>>> 
>>>> Trish Mau, librarian/web coordinator
>>>> Burnaby Public Library, 6100 Willingdon Avenue, Burnaby BC, V5H 4N5
>> tel. 604
>>> 436 5425  fax 604 436 9087
>>>> 
>>>> The contents of this message may not necessarily reflect the position
>> of
>>> Burnaby Public Library. If you have any concerns about this message,
>> please
>>> e-mail [log in to unmask]
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
>> Of
>>> Cary Gordon
>>>> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 11:11 AM
>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] project management system
>>>> 
>>>> I agree with Rosalyn that the key is what you mean by project
>>> management. I get the impression that you aren't looking for a ticketing
>>> system.
>>>> 
>>>> For lists and communication, we use (and like) Basecamp, but there are
>>> lots of good alternatives. PBWorks is another good hosted system. If you
>>> can host yourself, MediaWiki, which powers the code4lib wiki, has a huge
>>> community, is widely used in the library world, and ramps up relatively
>>> quickly.
>>>> 
>>>> We use Unfuddle for most of our ticketing, and they have a new planning
>>> product called Alchemy, which is in beta.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> 
>>>> Cary
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Jan 14, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Rosalyn Metz <[log in to unmask]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Kun,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I guess the first question I would ask is what do you mean by project
>>>>> management -- its kind of a big space.  Are you looking for something
>>>>> more like a ticketing system?  Is your primary concern keeping up
>>>>> communication on projects?  Or are you looking to create a project
>>>>> list that you can keep track of?  Are you trying to just outline what
>>> it is that your projects are?
>>>>> 
>>>>> If you're looking for a ticketing system I like GitHub Ticketing --
>>>>> its free and easy to use.  If you're primarily worried about keeping
>>>>> up communication with a different groups, google groups can suffice 9
>>> times
>>>>> out of 10.   If you're just looking to keep track of a list of
>> projects,
>>>>> you might be able to get away with something simple like a Google Form
>>>>> that submits to a spreadsheet.  If you're just outlining what your
>>>>> projects are you could just start off by creating project one pagers
>>>>> (ala Tito
>>>>> Sierra<http://www.slideshare.net/tsierra/the-projectonepager>
>>>>> ).
>>>>> 
>>>>> My recommendation would be to start off small (and free).  After a few
>>>>> months, re-evaluate and see where you are.  Maybe you'll realize you
>>>>> need something more robust (Unfuddle instead of GitHub Ticketing;
>>>>> Basecamp instead of Google Groups; time management planning instead of
>>>>> lists of projects; formal project plans instead of one pagers;).
>>>>> 
>>>>> Rosalyn
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Lin, Kun <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Our library is looking for a project management system. Does anyone
>>>>>> has any suggestions on which one to choose? We only have a very small
>>>>>> team and our main focus is to guide our librarians to submit their
>>>>>> ideas and for record tacking purposes.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Kun
>>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Cary Gordon
>>> The Cherry Hill Company
>>> http://chillco.com
>>> 
>> 
> 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager