On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Shaun Ellis <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Any policy that could result in people being removed or banned for failing
> to comply warrants a group decision.  Unless anyone presumes to speak for
> the group, online voting is the only tool we have to make it official.  I
> understand it's new territory, but does anyone have a problem with it?

I am uneasy about coming up with a policy for banning people (from
what?) and voting on it, before it's demonstrated that it's even
needed. Can't we just tackle these issues as they come up, in context,
rather than in the abstract?

Or has a specific issue come up, and I'm just being daft?

//Ed