If forgot about that. That issue was created quite awhile ago and I hadn't check on it in a long time. I've found that Jetty has worked fine in our production environment so far. As I wrote earlier, I have it connecting to a jena SDB that is used for a semantic web application (VIVO) that was developed here. Although we have the semantic web application running on a different server than the SDB database I found the performance was fairly significantly improved by having the Fuseki server running on the same machine as the SDB.
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ethan Gruber
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 2:52 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Fuseki and other SPARQL servers
I have investigated the possibility of deploying Fuseki as a war in Tomcat (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-201) because I wasn't sure how the default Jetty container would respond in production, but since you aren't having any problems with that deployment, I may go ahead and do that.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Hugh Cayless <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi Ethan!
> We've been using Jena/Fuseki in papyri.info for about a year now, iirc.
> We started with Mulgara, but switched. It's running in its own Jetty
> container in our system, but I've had no performance issues with it
> On Feb 20, 2013, at 14:31 , Ethan Gruber <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I have been playing around with Fuseki (
> > http://jena.apache.org/documentation/serving_data/index.html) for a
> > few months to get my feet wet with accessing and querying RDF. I
> > quite like it. I find it well documented and easy to set up. We
> > will soon deploy a SPARQL server in a production environment, and I
> > would like to know if others on the list have experience with Fuseki
> > in production, or have
> > recommendations. Mulgara is off the table as it inexplicably
> > conflicts with other apps installed in Tomcat.
> > Thanks,
> > Ethan