Jetty's performance characteristics are really very good. I'd have no hesitation in using it.
On Feb 20, 2013, at 14:52 , Ethan Gruber <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi Hugh,
> I have investigated the possibility of deploying Fuseki as a war in Tomcat (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-201) because I wasn't sure how
> the default Jetty container would respond in production, but since you
> aren't having any problems with that deployment, I may go ahead and do that.
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Hugh Cayless <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Hi Ethan!
>> We've been using Jena/Fuseki in papyri.info for about a year now, iirc.
>> We started with Mulgara, but switched. It's running in its own Jetty
>> container in our system, but I've had no performance issues with it
>> On Feb 20, 2013, at 14:31 , Ethan Gruber <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> I have been playing around with Fuseki (
>>> http://jena.apache.org/documentation/serving_data/index.html) for a few
>>> months to get my feet wet with accessing and querying RDF. I quite like
>>> it. I find it well documented and easy to set up. We will soon deploy a
>>> SPARQL server in a production environment, and I would like to know if
>>> others on the list have experience with Fuseki in production, or have
>>> recommendations. Mulgara is off the table as it inexplicably conflicts
>>> with other apps installed in Tomcat.