Thanks everyone for the info. This soothed my apprehensions of running
Fuseki in a production environment.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Ross Singer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I'll add that the LARQ plugin for Fuseki (which adds Lucene indexes) is
> pretty awesome, as well.
> On Feb 20, 2013, at 3:57 PM, John Fereira <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > If forgot about that. That issue was created quite awhile ago and I
> hadn't check on it in a long time. I've found that Jetty has worked fine
> in our production environment so far. As I wrote earlier, I have it
> connecting to a jena SDB that is used for a semantic web application (VIVO)
> that was developed here. Although we have the semantic web application
> running on a different server than the SDB database I found the performance
> was fairly significantly improved by having the Fuseki server running on
> the same machine as the SDB.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Ethan Gruber
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 2:52 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Fuseki and other SPARQL servers
> > Hi Hugh,
> > I have investigated the possibility of deploying Fuseki as a war in
> Tomcat (
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-201) because I wasn't sure
> how the default Jetty container would respond in production, but since you
> aren't having any problems with that deployment, I may go ahead and do that.
> > Ethan
> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Hugh Cayless <[log in to unmask]>
> >> Hi Ethan!
> >> We've been using Jena/Fuseki in papyri.info for about a year now, iirc.
> >> We started with Mulgara, but switched. It's running in its own Jetty
> >> container in our system, but I've had no performance issues with it
> >> whatever.
> >> Best,
> >> Hugh
> >> On Feb 20, 2013, at 14:31 , Ethan Gruber <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>> I have been playing around with Fuseki (
> >>> http://jena.apache.org/documentation/serving_data/index.html) for a
> >>> few months to get my feet wet with accessing and querying RDF. I
> >>> quite like it. I find it well documented and easy to set up. We
> >>> will soon deploy a SPARQL server in a production environment, and I
> >>> would like to know if others on the list have experience with Fuseki
> >>> in production, or have
> >> other
> >>> recommendations. Mulgara is off the table as it inexplicably
> >>> conflicts with other apps installed in Tomcat.
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Ethan