LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  July 2013

CODE4LIB July 2013

Subject:

Re: Python and Ruby

From:

Joshua Welker <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 29 Jul 2013 14:19:13 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (129 lines)

Thanks, this is more along the lines I was looking for.

I started using Python because PHP (my usual web language of choice) has
quite poor libraries for SOAP requests, and Python was easy to use as a
glue script to fill the SOAP holes in my program.

One of the things I wanted to ask that went largely unanswered is what
kinds of typical library coding activities are not very well supported in
either language? For instance:

-MARC i/o (both have this covered, I know, but it is a prime example)
-XML tools
-SPARQL tools
-Working with Solr
-MySQL/Postgres tools
-Screen scraping tools
-SOAP/REST tools

...etc.

And I am limiting my inquiry to Python and Ruby because I am looking for
quick "glue script" languages and not something to write a whole web app.
For instance, something I can schedule as a cron task to get some remote
data and index it locally. I would use PHP or Java for a full-blown
application. I guess I should include Perl in the discussion, too, but
Perl's syntax is a little heady for me.

I am not trying to be incendiary here, so I hope you all do not respond to
me as such. I think these are pretty reasonable and concrete questions.
It's not like I'm asking "What's the best language?" in a general and
open-ended way.

Josh Welker
Information Technology Librarian
James C. Kirkpatrick Library
University of Central Missouri
Warrensburg, MO 64093
JCKL 2260
660.543.8022


-----Original Message-----
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Scott Turnbull
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 12:17 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Python and Ruby

I think it mostly comes down to what you're looking for out of the
language choice. Both are great language. I love the explicitness and
community around Python, the meta-programming features of Ruby are a lot
of fun as well.

Both have great communities that support a lot of diversity. I feel
python comes out a bit better on this but only just a bit.


Some great fits for Python in libraries.
- Syntax is easy to learn so if you have to get a team working on the
same skillset this is a big advantage.
- If you need to work with scholars who need to learn programming, the
easy of learning python is a big advantage here.
- If you work in natural language processing or with geo-spacial data
then python is particularly well suited.
- You need a stable language with good backwards compatibility.

Some great fits for Ruby in libraries:
- If you do a lot of web development Rails is an obvious advantage,
though rails dominance is almost a disservice to the Ruby community by how
much it obscures the language.
- If you work with unstructured data I think Ruby comes out a little on
top (just a little) and there are some neat meta-programming techniques to
read and work with XML in ruby.
- You work in a DevOps environment and need to do a lot of server
provisioning, the Puppet library offers a lot to a group and leverages
Ruby.
- In libraries custom Fedora repository work is often done using the
Hydra gems

I don't think there's one better choice, it just comes down to knowing
what you need to develop as far as a local community goes and picking the
one that is best suited for those use cases.

That said, I tend to enjoy working in Python more than Ruby. Most of my
gripes with Ruby are actually probably with Rails so as a language I
really do think they are both fine and I only have a slight preference for
one.




On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Joshua Welker <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Not intending to start a language flame war/holy war here, but in the
> library coding community, is there a particular reason to use Ruby
> over Python or vice-versa? I am personally comfortable with Python,
> but I have noticed that there is a big Ruby following in Code4Lib and
> similar communities. Am I going to be able to contribute and work
> better with the community if I use Ruby rather than Python?
>
> I am 100% aware that there is no objective way to answer which of the
> two languages is the best. I am interested in the much more narrow
> question of which will work better for library-related scripting
> projects in terms of the following factors:
>
> -existing modules that I can re-use that are related to libraries
> (MARC tools, XML/RDF tools, modules released by major vendors, etc)
> -availability of help from others in the community -interest/ability
> of others to re-use my code
>
> Thanks.
>
> Josh Welker
> Information Technology Librarian
> James C. Kirkpatrick Library
> University of Central Missouri
> Warrensburg, MO 64093
> JCKL 2260
> 660.543.8022
>



--
*Scott Turnbull*
APTrust Technical Lead
[log in to unmask]
www.aptrust.org
678-379-9488

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager