A large number of triples that all have different provenance? I'm curious
as to how you get them :)

Rob


On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Hugh Cayless <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Does that work right down to the level of the individual triple though? If
> a large percentage of my triples are each in their own individual graphs,
> won't that be chaos? I really don't know the answer, it's not a rhetorical
> question!
>
> Hugh
>
> On Nov 6, 2013, at 10:40 , Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Named Graphs are the way to solve the issue you bring up in that post, in
> > my opinion.  You mint an identifier for the graph, and associate the
> > provenance and other information with that.  This then gets ingested as
> the
> > 4th URI into a quad store, so you don't lose the provenance information.
> >
> > In JSON-LD:
> > {
> >  "@id" : "uri-for-graph",
> >  "dcterms:creator" : "uri-for-hugh",
> >  "@graph" : [
> >   // ... triples go here ...
> >  ]
> > }
> >
> > Rob
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Hugh Cayless <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I wrote about this a few months back at
> >>
> http://blogs.library.duke.edu/dcthree/2013/07/27/the-trouble-with-triples/
> >>
> >> I'd be very interested to hear what the smart folks here think!
> >>
> >> Hugh
> >>
> >> On Nov 5, 2013, at 18:28 , Alexander Johannesen <
> >> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> But the
> >>> question to every piece of meta data is *authority*, which is the part
> >>> of RDF that sucks.
> >>
>