LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  March 2014

CODE4LIB March 2014

Subject:

Re: Book scanner suggestions redux

From:

"Goodell, Jon" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 19 Mar 2014 12:58:51 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (75 lines)

Great points, Jason! We have run into the same issue with Windows 7 drivers on our ILL scanner here. 

Jon Goodell, MA, AHIP
UAMS Reference and Outreach Librarian
501-526-5641, [log in to unmask]

-----Original Message-----
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of jason bengtson
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 6:14 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Book scanner suggestions redux

It's interesting to me to see people question the long term viability of an open source project. Not because it isn't a valid concern, but because, especially with scanners, the same issue arises with the commercial stuff. Just recently we have had to do some finagling with two very expensive ILL scanners so that we can isolate them from the network. Minolta doesn't make any Windows 7 or later drivers for them (nor does anyone else), effectively anchoring them to XP. I've seen this a few times now with scanners (probably because they tend to be longer term investments than other peripherals). The same seems to happen a lot with medical imaging devices. If I were a cynic I might suspect that Minolta and friends wanted to ensure turnover. I'm viewing the current situation as a stopgap until we can look at replacing the scanners, but, when we do that, I intend to move forward on much lower-priced alternatives. Given that, for a variety of reasons, we're pretty much a Windows shop, and given what seems to be the increasing pace of Windows releases, I feel like we have to consider that our scanners will have an highly indeterminate but likely limited shelf life. It's too bad . . . some company could probably do well by creating and selling third party drivers for some of these old imaging machines.

Best regards,

Jason Bengtson, MLIS, MA
Head of Library Computing and Information Systems Assistant Professor, Graduate College Department of Health Sciences Library and Information Management University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center 405-271-2285, opt. 5405-271-3297 (fax) [log in to unmask] http://library.ouhsc.edu www.jasonbengtson.com

NOTICE:
This e-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise exempt from disclosure. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by replying to the original message at the listed email address. Thank You.

On Mar 19, 2014, at 5:50 AM, Johannes Baiter <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> spreads developer chiming in here :-)
> 
> @Cindy:
> 
> I'm curious - how does the shooting time per page compare to something 
> like
>> a Minolta PS7000? We've got an old PS7000, buit my experience with 
>> the one I've used before was that it took sooo long to shoot each 
>> page.  Also, the
>> PS7000 model didn't accommodate a bound volume that wouldn't open 
>> flat all that well.  Would this be an improvement over that?
>> 
> 
> With my Canon A2200s I can currently shoot at 1400-1500 pages per 
> hour, although the bottleneck is probably my lifting the 
> cradle/flipping the pages.
> 
> @Aaron:
> 
> It seems like the software piece is a big variable with the DIYBookScanner.
>> It's interesting to hear about various setups, I just wonder about 
>> the
>> long(ish) term viability of some of these open source projects. 
>> Obviously, the software is essential for an efficient system and I'm 
>> not sure we're interested in building/maintaining our own suite of tools.
>> 
>> 
> 
> While I can't give any guarantees, I'm very optimistic that I'll 
> continue development for the foreseeable future.
> I'm very passionate about the software and the project (DIYBookScaner) 
> as a whole and my list of things I'd like to do in the software should 
> probably suffice for at least the next two years :-) And even in the 
> case that I should be hit by a bus, I've tried to make the code as 
> clear and idiomatic as possible, so an experienced Python developer 
> should be able to get up to speed pretty quickly.
> 
> Additionally, as Raffaele already mentioned, spreads is very modular, 
> you can add your own functionality very easily through the Plugin API.
> 
> If you are playing with the thought of using spreads in your 
> institution, please drop me a message, I would love to hear about your 
> workflow and what kinds of things you'd like the software to do.
> 
> All the best,
> Johannes

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager