LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  April 2014

CODE4LIB April 2014

Subject:

Re: getting URIs, was: [CODE4LIB] barriers to open metadata?

From:

Jonathan Rochkind <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 30 Apr 2014 14:13:39 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (134 lines)

If you want libraries to spend money on adding URI's to their data, 
there is going to need to be some clear benefit they get from doing it 
-- and it needs to be a pretty near-term benefit, not "Well, some day 
all these awesome things might happen, because linked data."


On 4/30/14 1:34 PM, Karen Coyle wrote:
> Thanks, Richard. I ask because it's one of the most common questions
> that I get -- often about WorldCat, but in general about any source of
> URIs -- "How do I connect my data (text forms) to their URIs?" And these
> questions usually come from library or archive projects with little or
> no programming staff. So it seems like we need to be able to answer that
> question so that people can get linked up. In fact, it seems to me that
> the most pressing need right now is an easy way (or one that someone
> else can do for you at a reasonable cost) to connect the text string
> "identifiers" that we have to URIs. I envision something like what we
> went through when we moved from AACR name forms to AACR2 name forms, and
> libraries were able to send their MARC records to a service that
> returned the records with the new name form. In this case, though, such
> a service would return the data with the appropriate URIs added. (In the
> case of MARC, in the $0 subfield.)
>
> It's great that the "big guys" like LC and OCLC are providing URIs for
> resources. But at the moment I feel like it's grapes dangling just
> beyond the reach of the folks we want to connect to. Any ideas on how to
> make this easy are welcome. And I do think that there's great potential
> for an enterprising start-up to provide an affordable service for
> libraries and archives. Of course, an open source "pass in your data in
> x or y format and we'll return it with URIs embedded" would be great,
> but I think it would be reasonable to charge for such a service.
>
> kc
>
>
> On 4/30/14, 9:59 AM, Richard Wallis wrote:
>> To unpack the several questions lurking in Karen’s question.
>>
>> As to being able to use the WorldCat Works data/identifiers there is no
>> difference between a or b - it is ODC-BY licensed data.
>>
>> Getting a Work URI may be easier for a) as they should be able to
>> identify
>> the OCLC Number and hence use the linked data from it’s URI <
>> http://worldcat.org/oclc/{ocn}> to pick up the link to it’s work.
>>
>> Tools such as xISBN <http://xisbn.worldcat.org/xisbnadmin/doc/api.htm>
>> can
>> step you towards identifier lookups and are openly available for low
>> volume
>> usage.
>>
>> Citation lookup is more a bib lookup feature, that you could get an OCLC
>> Number from. One of colleagues may be helpful on the particulars of this.
>>
>> Apologies for being WorldCat specific, but Karen did ask.
>>
>> ~Richard.
>>
>>
>> On 30 April 2014 17:15, Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> My question has to do with discoverability. Let's say that I have a
>>> bibliographic database and I want to add the OCLC work identifiers to
>>> it.
>>> Obviously I don't want to do it by hand. I might have ISBNs, but in some
>>> cases I will have a regular author/title-type citation.
>>>
>>> and let's say that I am asking this for two different institutions:
>>> a) is an OCLC member institution
>>> b) is not
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> kc
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/30/14, 8:47 AM, Dan Scott wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Roy Tennant <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This has now instead become a reasonable recommendation
>>>>>> concerning ODC-BY licensing [3] but the confusion and uncertainty
>>>>>> about which records an OCLC member may redistribute remains.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [3] http://www.oclc.org/news/releases/2012/201248.en.html
>>>>>>
>>>>> Allow me to try to put this confusion and uncertainty to rest once and
>>>>> for
>>>>> all:
>>>>>
>>>>> ALL THE THINGS. ALL.
>>>>>
>>>>> At least as far as we are concerned. I think it's well past time to
>>>>> put
>>>>> the
>>>>> past in the past.
>>>>>
>>>> That's great, Roy. That's a *lot* simpler than parsing the
>>>> recommendations, WCRR, community norms, and such at [A, B] :)
>>>>
>>>>   Meanwhile, we have just put nearly 200 million works records up as
>>>> linked
>>>>> open data. [1], [2], [3]. If that doesn't rock the library open linked
>>>>> data
>>>>> world, then no one is paying attention.
>>>>> Roy
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] http://oclc.org/en-US/news/releases/2014/201414dublin.html
>>>>> [2]
>>>>> http://dataliberate.com/2014/04/worldcat-works-197-million-
>>>>> nuggets-of-linked-data/
>>>>> [3] http://hangingtogether.org/?p=3811
>>>>>
>>>> Yes, that is really awesome. But Laura was asking about barriers to
>>>> open metadata, so damn you for going off-topic with PR around a lack
>>>> of barriers to some metadata (which, for those who have not looked
>>>> yet, have a nice ODC-BY licensing statement at the bottom of a given
>>>> Works page) :)
>>>>
>>>> A. http://oclc.org/worldcat/community/record-use.en.html
>>>> B. http://oclc.org/worldcat/community/record-use/data-
>>>> licensing/questions.en.html
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Karen Coyle
>>> [log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net
>>> m: 1-510-435-8234
>>> skype: kcoylenet
>>>
>>
>>
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager