There’s a nice “fork me on github” banner on the test site, so someone 
motivated could at least check the (purported) code and set up their 
own checker. So at least they have an implicit “you don’t need to trust 
us” sign.

-Tod

On Apr 8, 2014, at 10:00 AM, Francis Kayiwa <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 4/8/2014 10:27 AM, Chad Nelson wrote:
>> Francis,
>> 
>> Are you asking us to register our servers into a great big list of 
>> vulnerable machines?
> 
> Assumption here was.
> 
> Machine == vulnerable
> 
> Patch on confirmation but your point is well received.
> 
> ./fxk
> 
> 
> - -- 
> QOTD:
> 	"A child of 5 could understand this!  Fetch me a child of 5."
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
> 
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTRA8AAAoJEOptrq/fXk6MgQkH/2iKSVs7MkCghRRqv+RvaI/l
> Ul4lSQjIUDik0ofxlr7fywxP6CqbEkBAVCOGcVArrVTitpPe7w6/HAv6Q5uEZvDe
> QPR2k2oXpjXn7Kbm9dZAs/FVhgArQxYLcHXjbfy6bd3vCuo65KyCIc1zd4C9ICkN
> I1cUKgddwavuWszmjgI751bwLijtAEenWs6wW30iGpl7wyYMJV8+vkxkySxOb8rd
> vA5tVkZTWaIT9FDR9+j08tOajFlrh9Ole9ypSPwVRj/zNDZwigzDi9Dwv8W2nNnX
> 9ZNSkIUttIuUWL3+EXwLNdOKJa6Kgz9ztydjc0K2hskoS4YG9LyUX6i8JVJ95no=
> =4zbB
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----