This is disturbing to me.  I thought we had agreed not to mention the C4L Illuminati.




-----Original Message-----
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Maura Carbone
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 11:54 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Fwd: [CODE4LIB] Forwarding blog post: Apple, Android and NFC – how should libraries prepare? (RFID stuffs)

I feel like someone needs to design a C4L Illuminati t-shirt for C4L 2015.

On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Cornel Darden Jr. <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> C4l illuminati, I like it!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Cornel Darden Jr.
> MSLIS
> Library Department Chair
> South Suburban College
> 7087052945
>
> "Our Mission is to Serve our Students and the Community through lifelong
> learning."
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Oct 7, 2014, at 1:30 PM, Cary Gordon <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > I mean that there are plenty of individuals on the c4l list who are
> > involved at various levels with various standards bodies, NISO being the
> > most well represented. I was not referring to the shadowy c4l illuminati
> > society that controls everything.
> >
> > Cary
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Salazar, Christina <[log in to unmask]>
> > Date: Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 11:17 AM
> > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Forwarding blog post: Apple, Android and NFC –
> how
> > should libraries prepare? (RFID stuffs)
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> >
> >
> > OH NO! (shudder) I’m pretty sure no one is suggesting a "formalized c4l"
> > AGAIN - we've been there done that, relatively recently too.
> >
> > I think what we're talking about is a way to represent c4l interests in
> > standards making bodies.
> >
> > And just for my own edification, if you're saying c4l IS represented in
> > standards making bodies, please tell me who do I talk to? For instance on
> > the RFID thing, who can I talk to in order to find out HOW and IF this
> > conversation is happening with American standards making bodies?
> >
> > Or do you mean INDIVIDUALS who participate in c4l are represented in
> > standards making bodies?
> >
> > Christina
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> > Francis Kayiwa
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 11:07 AM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Forwarding blog post: Apple, Android and NFC –
> how
> > should libraries prepare? (RFID stuffs)
> >
> > On 10/07/2014 02:03 PM, Cary Gordon wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >  NISO (and LITA, ASIS&T,
> >> etc.) are quite well represented on this list, and I don't believe
> >> that a formalized c4l would give us any more say in standards that we
> > have already.
> >
> > +1
> >
> >
> > ./fxk
> >
> >
> > --
> > You single-handedly fought your way into this hopeless mess.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cary Gordon
> > The Cherry Hill Company
> > http://chillco.com
>



-- 
Maura Carbone
Digital Initiatives Librarian
Brandeis University
Library and Technology Services
(781) 736-4659
415 South Street, (MS 017/P.O. Box 549110)
Waltham, MA 02454-9110
email: [log in to unmask]