LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  November 2014

CODE4LIB November 2014

Subject:

Re: Stack Overflow

From:

Joshua Welker <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 4 Nov 2014 09:54:46 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (118 lines)

It sounds like the people running Stack Exchange are the same people
running Wikipedia. They have received a lot of publicity for similar
problems, especially removing edits from new users without explanation.
StackExchange, like Wikipedia, is a poor fit for libraries. Even though
these are great resources, the culture of the people in charge is too
different. We do share a common interest in open information. We do not
share the laissez-faire libertarian philosophy that is the mantra of
"Internet culture." Librarians believe in helping people with very few
qualifications. Internet culture believes in forcing people to help
themselves before giving any help. Once you have RTFM'ed, scoured the
entire web for even remotely similar versions of your question, and spent
hours crafting your question in such a way that it is generalizable and
without any basis in opinion, one of the (young white male middle-class)
True Internet People will float down from the clouds and reveal to the
world their unique and profound wisdom. 99% of people give up before
reaching this point, which is good because it separates the wheat from the
chaff.

Hosting our own community Q&A site sounds like the best option. OSQA is a
FOSS Q&A platform, but it is a Stack Exchange clone and has the
unfortunate reputation system built in. How hard would it be for us to
build a simple Q&A site using something like Ruby on Rails? It's such a
simple use case that a prototype could probably be whipped up in a few
hours. It would mostly be the kind of simple, canned CRUD pages that can
be generated automatically. Then you just add search functionality and
authentication, and voila.

Josh Welker


-----Original Message-----
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Joe Hourcle
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 8:54 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Stack Overflow

On Nov 4, 2014, at 9:12 AM, Schulkins, Joe wrote:

> Presumably I'm not alone in this, but I find Stack Overflow a valuable
resource for various bits of web development and I was wondering whether
anyone has given any thought about proposing a Library Technology site to
Stack Exchange's Area 51 (http://area51.stackexchange.com/)? Doing a
search of the proposals shows there was one for 'Libraries and Information
Science' but this closed 2 years ago as it didn't reach the required
levels during the beta phase.

Some history on the Stack Exchange site:

1. Before 'Stack Exchange 2.0', they used to let other sites pay them to
host Q&A sites.  There had been a library-focused site on Unshelved:

	http://www.unshelved.com/2010-7-15

2. We got *hundreds* of people from Unshelved Answers to sign up on Area
51 ... but they wouldn't start up the site unless enough people with high
enough reputation on existing 'Stack Exchange 2.0' sites expressed
interest, claiming that they needed sufficient people with knowledge of
the system.  I tried lobbying for them to count people w/ experience from
Unshelved Answers, but they wouldn't do it.

3. It took over a year for the 'Libraries' proposal to get enough support
to be accepted; by then, I assume most library folks had moved on.

4. They then named the site 'Library and Information Science', not
'Libraries'.

	http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/3846/5710

   After my complaining, they changed it to 'Libraries and Information
Science', but there was still a major problem:

5. As if all of the rest wasn't bad enough, we then had a bunch of
non-library people closing answers because there wasn't a single definite
answer, which was a large number of the questions on Unshelved Answers ...
and most of the 'example' questions were in that category as well:

	
https://web.archive.org/web/20120325030045/http://area51.stackexchange.com
/proposals/12432/libraries-information-science



> The reason I think this might be useful is that instead of individual
places to go for help or raise questions (i.e. various mailing lists)
there could be a 'one-stop' shop approach from which we could get help
with LMSs, discovery layers, repository software etc. I appreciate though
that certain vendors aren't particularly open (yes, Innovative I'm looking
at you here) and might not like these things being discussed on an open
forum.
>
> Does anybody else think this might be useful? Would such a forum be shot
down by all the vendors legalese wrapped up in their Terms and Conditions?
Or are you happy with the way you go about getting help?


I think that the Stack Exchange culture & policies make it a bad fit for
our community.  I think that yes, there is a need for such a site, but
that the issues with immediately closing questions without a clear answer
are a *huge* problem.  If questions were easily answered, we'd have done
the research and answered it outselves (most of us have LIS degrees and
know how to research things!).

You might also be able to get support from Unshelved again, and if we the
community can put together a site, have them brand it as 'Unshelved
Answers' again.

-Joe

ps.  I'm currently the moderator of OpenData.StackExchange.com; I was
previously the moderator of Seasoned Advice (aka.
cooking.stackexchange.com)

pps.  I also objected when they changed the name of the 'databases'
proposal to 'database administrators', which many of us felt narrowed the
scope dramatically ( http://meta.dba.stackexchange.com/q/1/51 ;
http://meta.dba.stackexchange.com/q/11/51 ).  I don't even bother with the
site these days.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager