I think it is pretty straightforward.
[] I am ok with my image, audio, and presentation being broadcast and archived (default)
[] I am not ok with my image being brodcasted, but will allow audio and slides
[] none of the above
This needs to be opt out, not opt in.
We are beating a dead horse at this point and complicating matters.
//Riley
Sent from my Windows Phone
--
Riley Childs
Senior
Charlotte United Christian Academy
Library Services Administrator
IT Services Administrator
(704) 537-0331x101
(704) 497-2086
rileychilds.net
@rowdychildren
I use Lync (select External Contact on any XMPP chat client)
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any files transmitted with it are the property of Charlotte United Christian Academy. This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential information that is privileged and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not one of the named original recipients or have received this e-mail in error, please permanently delete the original and any copy of any e-mail and any printout thereof. Thank you for your compliance. This email is also subject to copyright. No part of it nor any attachments may be reproduced, adapted, forwarded or transmitted without the written consent of the copyright [log in to unmask]
________________________________
From: Tara Robertson<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Sent: ý1/ý26/ý2015 9:34 PM
To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Conference photography policy
I don't imagine that many, if any, people will opt out. But I think the
process is important: How do you say yes when you don't know what you're
agreeing to? And how do you know if you have the option to opt out,
unless asked?
Thanks everyone,
Tara
On 2015-01-26, 5:17 PM, Tom Johnson wrote:
> Thank you, Tara and Ranti for taking this on. I'm sure even many speakers
> who have no problem being filmed will appreciate being notified and given
> the opportunity to opt in/out.
>
> - Tom
>
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Ranti Junus <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> I agree that streaming crew should be free from doing the paperwork. Tara
>> has volunteered to be the "paperwork" person and I'm volunteering to help
>> her out.
>>
>> I think streaming crew, Tara, and I can discuss separately on things that
>> are need to be done or information we should provide (e.g. list of those
>> who opt-out, their talk schedule, etc.) to the streaming crew.
>>
>>
>> thanks,
>> ranti.
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Cary Gordon <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> To be clear, what I said or tried to say is that the streaming crew needs
>>> to know if he presenter does not wish to be shown, or if they do not want
>>> their presentation shown before they start presenting. At least one full
>>> minute before would be great. They can take our word that we will honor
>>> their wishes.
>>>
>>> I think that it is fair to say that nobody involved with the video wants
>>> anything to do with paperwork, and if anyone has the time and energy to
>> do
>>> that, their time would be better spent actually working on the video
>> crew,
>>> which at this point is virtually nonexistent.
>>>
>>> Every presenter should know that we will be putting up video of their
>>> session or talk on our YouTube channel with a CC license, unless they
>>> demure. We should have a small sign to that effect at the podium, as
>> well.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cary Gordon
>>> The Cherry Hill Company
>>> http://chillco.com
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Bulk mail. Postage paid.
>>
|
