Jason et al.,
It looks like the problem was introducing a new category:
I reverted the main page back to the edits done on February 12th. The only
thing lost was the the c4l16 changes.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Jason Bengtson <[log in to unmask]>
> Could a glitch in the last upgrade be the culprit?
> Best regards,
> *Jason Bengtson, MLIS, MA*
> Head of Library Computing and Information Systems
> Assistant Professor, Graduate College
> Department of Health Sciences Library and Information Management
> University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
> 405-271-2285, opt. 5
> 405-271-3297 (fax)
> [log in to unmask]
> This e-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is
> addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
> otherwise exempt from disclosure. If the reader of this e-mail is not the
> intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the
> message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
> immediately notify us by replying to the original message at the listed
> email address. Thank You.
> <[log in to unmask]>
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Becky Yoose <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > Yeah, something must have happened with the last edit. However, when I
> > compare the two revisions before the last one, the diffs show up fine on
> > end:
> > I'll hold off on doing the undo option for the last edit to see if that
> > fixes things if folks want to prod this a bit more.
> > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 9:51 AM, David Fiander <[log in to unmask]>
> > > The main page (http://wiki.code4lib.org/Main_Page) is displaying as
> > > blank, and the history does not indicate any changes that would cause
> > to
> > > be so. In fact, the history for EARLIER changes (eg, my change to
> > > the "new!" text from the link to C4LN) are not displaying properly in
> > > diffs.
> > >
> > > So, I suspect that something is scrambled.
> > >
> > > - David
> > >