In conjunction with the "distributed location" pre-conferences AND multi-track the proposal is not very appealing.
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Fox, Bobbi
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 10:51 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Vote for Code4lib 2016 location
Is there wiggle room on the Philadelphia "multiple track" proposal, or do those of us who would prefer single track only have the [not]choice of voting for L.A.?
> > On Feb 22, 2015, at 8:48 PM, Francis Kayiwa <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > Hey All,
> > Just wanted to make everyone aware of the two fantastic proposals to
> host Code4lib 2016 that have been submitted. The cities of of Los
> Angeles and Philadelphia have submitted proposals which are now
> available at the official Code4lib Website
> > http://code4lib.org/content/code4lib-2016-conference-proposals
> > Voting will open tomorrow (UTC so probably already open if you are
> reading this) and will remain open until 2015-03-07 08:00:00 UTC
> > You can vote here (registration required)
> > http://vote.code4lib.org/election/37
> > Thanks to the both cities for their submissions.
> > best regards,
> > Francis
> > --
> > FORTUNE PROVIDES QUESTIONS FOR THE GREAT ANSWERS: #13
> > A: Doc, Happy, Bashful, Dopey, Sneezy, Sleepy, & Grumpy
> > Q: Who were the Democratic presidential candidates?