Mark Phillips has a related blog post that I think is an excellent place to start, which outlines a system for scoring how complete a record is:
There was some discussion on twitter recently about this, which you can look up on the #metadataquality hashtag: https://twitter.com/hashtag/metadataquality
I think there was a move to setup a mailing list for this topic or something like that, but I'm not sure where that stands now.
> On 05/06/15, at 7:21 AM, Sergio Letuche <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hello community,
> is there a way, any statistical approach, that you are aware of that let's
> say, allows one to have an idea of how "complete" a record is, or what are
> the actions you take in order to have an idea of the quality of a record,
> and eventually a database?
> Thank you in advance