LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  September 2015

CODE4LIB September 2015

Subject:

Re: archivespace vs contentdm

From:

Sarah Romkey <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 17 Sep 2015 08:16:39 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (596 lines)

Dear Kaile,

I've been watching this thread with interest, since it involves two systems
that Archivematica, an open-source digital preservation platform currently
connects to.

The use cases that we've been working with so far between Archivematica and
CONTENTdm/ArchivesSpace is that institutions would wish to upload access
copies (dissemination information packages, or DIPs in OAIS terms) from
Archivematica to one of these access systems. Because ArchivesSpace isn't a
repository for digital objects in and of itself, the access information
sent is actually metadata, with a back-end workflow to provide a link to
the actual digital objects. In the case of CONTENTdm, Archivematica can
create a tab delimited file for the purpose of making an explicit
connection between your preservation and access copies. You then use the
CONTENTdm Project Client to upload your digital objects and the tab file
from Archivematica.

We haven't made a public release of the integration with ArchivesSpace yet,
but in its first iteration it will be very similar to Archivists Toolkit,
as described here:

https://www.archivematica.org/en/docs/archivematica-1.4/user-manual/access/archivists-toolkit/#archivists-toolkit

The  CONTENTdm integration is described here:

https://www.archivematica.org/en/docs/archivematica-1.4/user-manual/access/contentdm/#contentdm

There isn't currently a workflow that would connect Archivematica to both
ArchivesSpace and CONTENTdm simultaneously, but that's a really interesting
idea. If anyone is interested in pursuing that discussion further, I'd
encourage you to jump on the Archivematica user forum:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/archivematica

The idea behind involving Archivematica in this workflow is to add digital
preservation tasks to your digital object workflow. This may not be your
focus at the moment, but I hope this provides some helpful food for thought!

Cheers,

Sarah

Sarah Romkey, MAS,MLIS
Systems Archivist
Artefactual Systems <http://artefactual.com>
604-527-2056
@archivematica <http://www.twitter.com/archivematica> / @accesstomemory
<http://www.twitter.com/accesstomemory>

>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date:    Wed, 16 Sep 2015 19:45:09 +0000
> From:    Kaile Zhu <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: archivespace vs contentdm
>
> We just signed on as an AS member with Lyrasis.  At this point, it's
> unlikely we would consider adopting other solutions.  We also use ContentDM
> as our front-end Web presentation of our archives collection.  My initial
> question was, is that a good combination?  Thanks.  - Kelly
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Cary Gordon
> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 6:38 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] archivespace vs contentdm
>
> I would rather let AS speak for itself.
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.archivesspace.org_overview&d=BQIFaQ&c=URKFmO0h1-PpCttSQ3v_bEhalPi_sNmh-_LG0Bso5YA&r=UmjVf-1YCnSJ8ymaevl-35Anh5CG-YF09ZrBGH_xV3U&m=21wYRg9PxyEeOZGW5edh3QXYJHBE_kOjSD8JHtjQ8dE&s=4w_81yrrwdu64xk0YcPm3nYynyFes3_vYkNNs-IKvR4&e=
>
> I don't think that I made a clear distinction, and like many modern tools,
> AS can do a lot beyond its core function. It can be used to present digital
> collections, but that is not its strength. It can also integrate with
> repository software — I have seen it working with DSpace — to provide a
> more integrated, archive oriented solution.
>
> I am far from being an AS expert. How does your institution use
> Archivesspace?
>
> Cary
>
> On Tuesday, September 15, 2015, Kaile Zhu <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Interesting to hear that AS is more a management tool rather than a
> > digital asset management tool.  Can you elaborate?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]
> > <javascript:;>] On Behalf Of Cary Gordon
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 4:27 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask] <javascript:;>
> > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] archivespace vs contentdm
> >
> > If your goal is digital asset management, you might want to consider a
> > more complete and modern solution like Islandora or Hydra. ContentDM
> > is a bit long in the tooth, expensive, and does not manage and store
> > original assets.
> >
> > Archivesspace has some overlap with asset management tools, but really
> > it is intended to serve the archivist community. It is more of a
> > management tool.
> >
> > We work with Islandora, a mashup of Drupal and the Fedora repository
> > system. It is an end-to-end operation that offers everything from
> > ingest to display. We offer hosting , training, customization and
> > support. The software, of course, is free and open-source.
> >
> > We also work with Archivesspace.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Cary Gordon, MLS
> > The Cherry Hill Company
> >
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__chillco.com&d=BQID
> > Ag&c=URKFmO0h1-PpCttSQ3v_bEhalPi_sNmh-_LG0Bso5YA&r=UmjVf-1YCnSJ8ymaevl
> > -35Anh5CG-YF09ZrBGH_xV3U&m=Y36UKe3GI_JwX8S6vnj8k-2G4vwC7JCdGwWdN85QJxg
> > &s=YqMwqwP4Xy1MVI6H4Ce4PedhCcHyQ51M48E7RkAGCFs&e=
> >
> > > On Sep 15, 2015, at 2:09 PM, Kaile Zhu <[log in to unmask]
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > > My library archives collection has both archivesspace and contentdm
> > installed or subscribed.  AS is used for storing data.  CDM is used
> > also for storing data, and for displaying content, like digital images,
> as well.
> > >
> > > Does it make sense to have both?  Can we use one platform to achieve
> > > the
> > goal - storing data and publishing the content to the Web?  If yes,
> > which one to choose?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Kelly Zhu
> > > 361.597.4082
> >
>
>
> --
> Cary Gordon
> The Cherry Hill Company
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__chillco.com&d=BQIFaQ&c=URKFmO0h1-PpCttSQ3v_bEhalPi_sNmh-_LG0Bso5YA&r=UmjVf-1YCnSJ8ymaevl-35Anh5CG-YF09ZrBGH_xV3U&m=21wYRg9PxyEeOZGW5edh3QXYJHBE_kOjSD8JHtjQ8dE&s=rqepjTBiXSZV7AJPk0EkWYBKf4h8QVT1vLMLJ3e0-Gw&e=
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date:    Wed, 16 Sep 2015 19:55:07 +0000
> From:    Kari R Smith <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: archivespace vs contentdm
>
> Hi Kelly,
> As you describe what you are doing, Yes I think that is a good
> combination.  AS is an archival management system and is necessary to
> manage archival collections through the various stages of:  Accession,
> collection description, collection locations, and processing and rights
> information.  This is for both analog and digital collections -- and
> archives will continue to need to manage, describe, and give access to both
> analog and digital material for decades to come.  ContentDM does not manage
> the administrative data about archival collections that ArchivesSpace
> does.  ContentDM is about a patron front end to access digital content -
> some of which will come from archival or special collections.
>
> Kari
>
> Kari R. Smith, Digital Archivist
> MIT Libraries, Institute Archives and Special Collections
> 617-258-5568  |   smithkr (at) mit.edu
> http://libraries.mit.edu/archives/
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Kaile Zhu
> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 3:45 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] archivespace vs contentdm
>
> We just signed on as an AS member with Lyrasis.  At this point, it's
> unlikely we would consider adopting other solutions.  We also use ContentDM
> as our front-end Web presentation of our archives collection.  My initial
> question was, is that a good combination?  Thanks.  - Kelly
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Cary Gordon
> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 6:38 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] archivespace vs contentdm
>
> I would rather let AS speak for itself.
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.archivesspace.org_overview&d=BQIFaQ&c=URKFmO0h1-PpCttSQ3v_bEhalPi_sNmh-_LG0Bso5YA&r=UmjVf-1YCnSJ8ymaevl-35Anh5CG-YF09ZrBGH_xV3U&m=21wYRg9PxyEeOZGW5edh3QXYJHBE_kOjSD8JHtjQ8dE&s=4w_81yrrwdu64xk0YcPm3nYynyFes3_vYkNNs-IKvR4&e=
>
> I don't think that I made a clear distinction, and like many modern tools,
> AS can do a lot beyond its core function. It can be used to present digital
> collections, but that is not its strength. It can also integrate with
> repository software — I have seen it working with DSpace — to provide a
> more integrated, archive oriented solution.
>
> I am far from being an AS expert. How does your institution use
> Archivesspace?
>
> Cary
>
> On Tuesday, September 15, 2015, Kaile Zhu <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Interesting to hear that AS is more a management tool rather than a
> > digital asset management tool.  Can you elaborate?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]
> > <javascript:;>] On Behalf Of Cary Gordon
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 4:27 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask] <javascript:;>
> > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] archivespace vs contentdm
> >
> > If your goal is digital asset management, you might want to consider a
> > more complete and modern solution like Islandora or Hydra. ContentDM
> > is a bit long in the tooth, expensive, and does not manage and store
> > original assets.
> >
> > Archivesspace has some overlap with asset management tools, but really
> > it is intended to serve the archivist community. It is more of a
> > management tool.
> >
> > We work with Islandora, a mashup of Drupal and the Fedora repository
> > system. It is an end-to-end operation that offers everything from
> > ingest to display. We offer hosting , training, customization and
> > support. The software, of course, is free and open-source.
> >
> > We also work with Archivesspace.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Cary Gordon, MLS
> > The Cherry Hill Company
> >
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__chillco.com&d=BQID
> > Ag&c=URKFmO0h1-PpCttSQ3v_bEhalPi_sNmh-_LG0Bso5YA&r=UmjVf-1YCnSJ8ymaevl
> > -35Anh5CG-YF09ZrBGH_xV3U&m=Y36UKe3GI_JwX8S6vnj8k-2G4vwC7JCdGwWdN85QJxg
> > &s=YqMwqwP4Xy1MVI6H4Ce4PedhCcHyQ51M48E7RkAGCFs&e=
> >
> > > On Sep 15, 2015, at 2:09 PM, Kaile Zhu <[log in to unmask]
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > > My library archives collection has both archivesspace and contentdm
> > installed or subscribed.  AS is used for storing data.  CDM is used
> > also for storing data, and for displaying content, like digital images,
> as well.
> > >
> > > Does it make sense to have both?  Can we use one platform to achieve
> > > the
> > goal - storing data and publishing the content to the Web?  If yes,
> > which one to choose?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Kelly Zhu
> > > 361.597.4082
> >
>
>
> --
> Cary Gordon
> The Cherry Hill Company
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__chillco.com&d=BQIFaQ&c=URKFmO0h1-PpCttSQ3v_bEhalPi_sNmh-_LG0Bso5YA&r=UmjVf-1YCnSJ8ymaevl-35Anh5CG-YF09ZrBGH_xV3U&m=21wYRg9PxyEeOZGW5edh3QXYJHBE_kOjSD8JHtjQ8dE&s=rqepjTBiXSZV7AJPk0EkWYBKf4h8QVT1vLMLJ3e0-Gw&e=
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date:    Wed, 16 Sep 2015 20:09:08 +0000
> From:    Kaile Zhu <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: archivespace vs contentdm
>
> Thanks, Kari,
>
> The practice here, as we have planned, would be like this: for any
> archived items, we would enter data separately into AS and CDM.  Is that
> the right way to do that?  I doubt it.  What is the correct way to allow
> the front-end CDM to display the records in the back-end AS?  Through
> network connection?  Or there is an export/import mechanism on both AS and
> CDM to sych the data storage on both places?
>
> Thanks again for your help.
>
> Kelly
> 361.593.4082
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Kari R Smith
> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 2:55 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] archivespace vs contentdm
>
> Hi Kelly,
> As you describe what you are doing, Yes I think that is a good
> combination.  AS is an archival management system and is necessary to
> manage archival collections through the various stages of:  Accession,
> collection description, collection locations, and processing and rights
> information.  This is for both analog and digital collections -- and
> archives will continue to need to manage, describe, and give access to both
> analog and digital material for decades to come.  ContentDM does not manage
> the administrative data about archival collections that ArchivesSpace
> does.  ContentDM is about a patron front end to access digital content -
> some of which will come from archival or special collections.
>
> Kari
>
> Kari R. Smith, Digital Archivist
> MIT Libraries, Institute Archives and Special Collections
> 617-258-5568  |   smithkr (at) mit.edu
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__libraries.mit.edu_archives_&d=BQIDaQ&c=URKFmO0h1-PpCttSQ3v_bEhalPi_sNmh-_LG0Bso5YA&r=UmjVf-1YCnSJ8ymaevl-35Anh5CG-YF09ZrBGH_xV3U&m=-CFnrKw8GVHUTdlRPQQ2Xx2ZfMhm3OneLRxw_2Pfo_0&s=JfpTJHHyO757Cizn1HAPFUTqX9_MEp7Zl0lPeAIaLM0&e=
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Kaile Zhu
> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 3:45 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] archivespace vs contentdm
>
> We just signed on as an AS member with Lyrasis.  At this point, it's
> unlikely we would consider adopting other solutions.  We also use ContentDM
> as our front-end Web presentation of our archives collection.  My initial
> question was, is that a good combination?  Thanks.  - Kelly
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Cary Gordon
> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 6:38 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] archivespace vs contentdm
>
> I would rather let AS speak for itself.
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.archivesspace.org_overview&d=BQIFaQ&c=URKFmO0h1-PpCttSQ3v_bEhalPi_sNmh-_LG0Bso5YA&r=UmjVf-1YCnSJ8ymaevl-35Anh5CG-YF09ZrBGH_xV3U&m=21wYRg9PxyEeOZGW5edh3QXYJHBE_kOjSD8JHtjQ8dE&s=4w_81yrrwdu64xk0YcPm3nYynyFes3_vYkNNs-IKvR4&e=
>
> I don't think that I made a clear distinction, and like many modern tools,
> AS can do a lot beyond its core function. It can be used to present digital
> collections, but that is not its strength. It can also integrate with
> repository software — I have seen it working with DSpace — to provide a
> more integrated, archive oriented solution.
>
> I am far from being an AS expert. How does your institution use
> Archivesspace?
>
> Cary
>
> On Tuesday, September 15, 2015, Kaile Zhu <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Interesting to hear that AS is more a management tool rather than a
> > digital asset management tool.  Can you elaborate?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]
> > <javascript:;>] On Behalf Of Cary Gordon
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 4:27 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask] <javascript:;>
> > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] archivespace vs contentdm
> >
> > If your goal is digital asset management, you might want to consider a
> > more complete and modern solution like Islandora or Hydra. ContentDM
> > is a bit long in the tooth, expensive, and does not manage and store
> > original assets.
> >
> > Archivesspace has some overlap with asset management tools, but really
> > it is intended to serve the archivist community. It is more of a
> > management tool.
> >
> > We work with Islandora, a mashup of Drupal and the Fedora repository
> > system. It is an end-to-end operation that offers everything from
> > ingest to display. We offer hosting , training, customization and
> > support. The software, of course, is free and open-source.
> >
> > We also work with Archivesspace.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Cary Gordon, MLS
> > The Cherry Hill Company
> >
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__chillco.com&d=BQID
> > Ag&c=URKFmO0h1-PpCttSQ3v_bEhalPi_sNmh-_LG0Bso5YA&r=UmjVf-1YCnSJ8ymaevl
> > -35Anh5CG-YF09ZrBGH_xV3U&m=Y36UKe3GI_JwX8S6vnj8k-2G4vwC7JCdGwWdN85QJxg
> > &s=YqMwqwP4Xy1MVI6H4Ce4PedhCcHyQ51M48E7RkAGCFs&e=
> >
> > > On Sep 15, 2015, at 2:09 PM, Kaile Zhu <[log in to unmask]
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > > My library archives collection has both archivesspace and contentdm
> > installed or subscribed.  AS is used for storing data.  CDM is used
> > also for storing data, and for displaying content, like digital images,
> as well.
> > >
> > > Does it make sense to have both?  Can we use one platform to achieve
> > > the
> > goal - storing data and publishing the content to the Web?  If yes,
> > which one to choose?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Kelly Zhu
> > > 361.597.4082
> >
>
>
> --
> Cary Gordon
> The Cherry Hill Company
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__chillco.com&d=BQIFaQ&c=URKFmO0h1-PpCttSQ3v_bEhalPi_sNmh-_LG0Bso5YA&r=UmjVf-1YCnSJ8ymaevl-35Anh5CG-YF09ZrBGH_xV3U&m=21wYRg9PxyEeOZGW5edh3QXYJHBE_kOjSD8JHtjQ8dE&s=rqepjTBiXSZV7AJPk0EkWYBKf4h8QVT1vLMLJ3e0-Gw&e=
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date:    Wed, 16 Sep 2015 20:17:44 +0000
> From:    Kari R Smith <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: archivespace vs contentdm
>
> Hi Kelly,
> Many institutions use ArchivesSpace (or formerly Archivists' Toolkit or
> Archon) as their management system of record.  And an export of a sub-set
> of the descriptive data for use in an access system.  I suggest that you
> take this discussion over to the ArchivesSpace user group email list and
> ask who there is using those two tools together and ask about their
> workflows.  Also, if you are not already involving your archivists in this
> discussion you should. :-)        Email List:
> [log in to unmask]
>
> You can export descriptive data (and other) from ArchivesSpace as EAD XML
> and then transform that into the subset you want for populating the records
> in ContentDM.
>
> There is an email list of the orgs who are using the LYRASIS hosted
> ArchivesSpace and that will also be a good list of folks to contact with
> this question.
>
> Kari Smith
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Kaile Zhu
> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 4:09 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] archivespace vs contentdm
>
> Thanks, Kari,
>
> The practice here, as we have planned, would be like this: for any
> archived items, we would enter data separately into AS and CDM.  Is that
> the right way to do that?  I doubt it.  What is the correct way to allow
> the front-end CDM to display the records in the back-end AS?  Through
> network connection?  Or there is an export/import mechanism on both AS and
> CDM to sych the data storage on both places?
>
> Thanks again for your help.
>
> Kelly
> 361.593.4082
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Kari R Smith
> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 2:55 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] archivespace vs contentdm
>
> Hi Kelly,
> As you describe what you are doing, Yes I think that is a good
> combination.  AS is an archival management system and is necessary to
> manage archival collections through the various stages of:  Accession,
> collection description, collection locations, and processing and rights
> information.  This is for both analog and digital collections -- and
> archives will continue to need to manage, describe, and give access to both
> analog and digital material for decades to come.  ContentDM does not manage
> the administrative data about archival collections that ArchivesSpace
> does.  ContentDM is about a patron front end to access digital content -
> some of which will come from archival or special collections.
>
> Kari
>
> Kari R. Smith, Digital Archivist
> MIT Libraries, Institute Archives and Special Collections
> 617-258-5568  |   smithkr (at) mit.edu
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__libraries.mit.edu_archives_&d=BQIDaQ&c=URKFmO0h1-PpCttSQ3v_bEhalPi_sNmh-_LG0Bso5YA&r=UmjVf-1YCnSJ8ymaevl-35Anh5CG-YF09ZrBGH_xV3U&m=-CFnrKw8GVHUTdlRPQQ2Xx2ZfMhm3OneLRxw_2Pfo_0&s=JfpTJHHyO757Cizn1HAPFUTqX9_MEp7Zl0lPeAIaLM0&e=
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Kaile Zhu
> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 3:45 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] archivespace vs contentdm
>
> We just signed on as an AS member with Lyrasis.  At this point, it's
> unlikely we would consider adopting other solutions.  We also use ContentDM
> as our front-end Web presentation of our archives collection.  My initial
> question was, is that a good combination?  Thanks.  - Kelly
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Cary Gordon
> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 6:38 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] archivespace vs contentdm
>
> I would rather let AS speak for itself.
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.archivesspace.org_overview&d=BQIFaQ&c=URKFmO0h1-PpCttSQ3v_bEhalPi_sNmh-_LG0Bso5YA&r=UmjVf-1YCnSJ8ymaevl-35Anh5CG-YF09ZrBGH_xV3U&m=21wYRg9PxyEeOZGW5edh3QXYJHBE_kOjSD8JHtjQ8dE&s=4w_81yrrwdu64xk0YcPm3nYynyFes3_vYkNNs-IKvR4&e=
>
> I don't think that I made a clear distinction, and like many modern tools,
> AS can do a lot beyond its core function. It can be used to present digital
> collections, but that is not its strength. It can also integrate with
> repository software — I have seen it working with DSpace — to provide a
> more integrated, archive oriented solution.
>
> I am far from being an AS expert. How does your institution use
> Archivesspace?
>
> Cary
>
> On Tuesday, September 15, 2015, Kaile Zhu <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Interesting to hear that AS is more a management tool rather than a
> > digital asset management tool.  Can you elaborate?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]
> > <javascript:;>] On Behalf Of Cary Gordon
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 4:27 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask] <javascript:;>
> > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] archivespace vs contentdm
> >
> > If your goal is digital asset management, you might want to consider a
> > more complete and modern solution like Islandora or Hydra. ContentDM
> > is a bit long in the tooth, expensive, and does not manage and store
> > original assets.
> >
> > Archivesspace has some overlap with asset management tools, but really
> > it is intended to serve the archivist community. It is more of a
> > management tool.
> >
> > We work with Islandora, a mashup of Drupal and the Fedora repository
> > system. It is an end-to-end operation that offers everything from
> > ingest to display. We offer hosting , training, customization and
> > support. The software, of course, is free and open-source.
> >
> > We also work with Archivesspace.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Cary Gordon, MLS
> > The Cherry Hill Company
> >
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__chillco.com&d=BQID
> > Ag&c=URKFmO0h1-PpCttSQ3v_bEhalPi_sNmh-_LG0Bso5YA&r=UmjVf-1YCnSJ8ymaevl
> > -35Anh5CG-YF09ZrBGH_xV3U&m=Y36UKe3GI_JwX8S6vnj8k-2G4vwC7JCdGwWdN85QJxg
> > &s=YqMwqwP4Xy1MVI6H4Ce4PedhCcHyQ51M48E7RkAGCFs&e=
> >
> > > On Sep 15, 2015, at 2:09 PM, Kaile Zhu <[log in to unmask]
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > >
> > > My library archives collection has both archivesspace and contentdm
> > installed or subscribed.  AS is used for storing data.  CDM is used
> > also for storing data, and for displaying content, like digital images,
> as well.
> > >
> > > Does it make sense to have both?  Can we use one platform to achieve
> > > the
> > goal - storing data and publishing the content to the Web?  If yes,
> > which one to choose?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Kelly Zhu
> > > 361.597.4082
> >
>
>
> --
> Cary Gordon
> The Cherry Hill Company
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__chillco.com&d=BQIFaQ&c=URKFmO0h1-PpCttSQ3v_bEhalPi_sNmh-_LG0Bso5YA&r=UmjVf-1YCnSJ8ymaevl-35Anh5CG-YF09ZrBGH_xV3U&m=21wYRg9PxyEeOZGW5edh3QXYJHBE_kOjSD8JHtjQ8dE&s=rqepjTBiXSZV7AJPk0EkWYBKf4h8QVT1vLMLJ3e0-Gw&e=
>
>
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager