LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  September 2015

CODE4LIB September 2015

Subject:

Fwd: Contract Opportunity: Request for Proposals for RightsStatements.org

From:

"Mark A. Matienzo" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 18 Sep 2015 12:17:58 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (280 lines)

The Digital Public Library of America (http://dp.la
<http://us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e1490d1305c4b651f3ad0ace4&id=2e0200ac51&e=e254285d2b>)
and Europeana (http://europeana.eu
<http://us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e1490d1305c4b651f3ad0ace4&id=4d41a57d00&e=e254285d2b>)
invites interested and qualified individuals or firms to submit a proposal
for development related to the infrastructure for the International Rights
Statements Working Group.

   - A PDF version of this request for proposals is also available at:
   http://dp.la/info/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/rs-rfp.pdf
   <http://us4.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=e1490d1305c4b651f3ad0ace4&id=557dec30fb&e=e254285d2b>
   - A PDF version of the *Requirements for the Technical Infrastructure
   for Standardized International Rights Statements *is available at:
   http://dp.la/info/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/irswg-tech-white-paper-rfp.pdf
   <http://us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e1490d1305c4b651f3ad0ace4&id=b155661dfd&e=e254285d2b>

Timeline

   - RFP issued: *18 September 2015*
   - Deadline for proposals: *00:00 GMT, 6 October 2015*
   - Work is to be performed no sooner than 8 October 2015.
   - Functional prototypes for components A and C must be completed by *24
   December 2015*.
   - Work for components A, B, and C below must be completed by* 15 January
   2016*.

Overview

This document specifies the project scope and requirements for technical
infrastructure supporting a framework and vocabulary of machine-readable
rights statements under development by the International Rights Statements
Working Group, a joint Digital Public Library of America (DPLA)–Europeana
Foundation working group.

The working group shall provide and maintain RDF descriptions
<http://us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e1490d1305c4b651f3ad0ace4&id=b4b623f5ed&e=e254285d2b>
of
the rights statements, with canonical serializations in Turtle
<http://us4.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=e1490d1305c4b651f3ad0ace4&id=cf2ed5e166&e=e254285d2b>,
modeled as a vocabulary in the Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS)
<http://us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e1490d1305c4b651f3ad0ace4&id=603f3d18a8&e=e254285d2b>.
These descriptions will include multiple official translations of each
statement, and support versioning of the statements and/or vocabulary
scheme. Alongside the descriptions statements, the working group will
produce a summary of the data model and properties used.

The contractor will provide an implementation that acts as a platform for
hosting these statements. The platform consists of an application for
publishing the rights statements according to linked data best practices
and a content management system to be used by the working group to publish
materials related to the project. These two components should provide the
feel of an integrated user experience, and must be served publicly from a
single domain (http://rightsstatements.org/). As part of this contract, the
contractor will also provide one year of maintenance, support, and security
updates for these components, their dependencies, and the operating systems
for servers on which they are deployed.
ComponentsComponent A. Rights Statements Application

A web application that provides both machine-readable representations of
the rights statements (in RDF serializations including JSON-LD and Turtle)
and human-readable representations. The working group will provide a canonical
version of the rights statements in Turtle-serialized RDF as needed for
launch
<http://us4.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=e1490d1305c4b651f3ad0ace4&id=bb3356f7c2&e=e254285d2b>,
as well as a testing version used to implement and test specific features,
including, but not limited to, versions (see 3a) and translations (see 4b
and 4c).

   1. Human readable representations
      1. The application shall provide a human-readable web page
      representing each rights statement, with provision for versions, multiple
      language support, and additional request parameters as described
in *Requirements
      for the Technical Infrastructure for Standardized International Rights
      Statements
      <http://us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e1490d1305c4b651f3ad0ace4&id=c99e76eb70&e=e254285d2b>*
      .
      2. All human-readable representations shall be generated from the
      canonical Turtle-serialized RDF.
      3. Human-readable representations must be available as HTML5 with
      RDFa 1.1 or RDFa 1.1 Lite.
      4. Human-readable representations must provide links to the RDF
      representations listed below.
   2. RDF representations
      1. The application shall provide multiple RDF serializations of the
      individual rights statements through content negotiation on the statement
      URI. Minimally, it must support Turtle and JSON-LD
      <http://us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e1490d1305c4b651f3ad0ace4&id=3ebdefb9ef&e=e254285d2b>.
      Additional serializations are desirable but not required.
      2. The application shall provide multiple RDF serializations of the
      entire vocabulary through content negotiation on the vocabulary version
      URI.  The vocabulary shall support the same RDF serializations as the
      individual statements.
      3. All RDF serializations must be equivalent to the canonical
      Turtle-serialized RDF.
   3. Versions
      1. The application shall support multiple versions of each statement.
      The structure of the versions is described in *Requirements for the
      Technical Infrastructure for Standardized International Rights Statements
      <http://us4.list-manage2.com/track/click?u=e1490d1305c4b651f3ad0ace4&id=fe408cdfc5&e=e254285d2b>*
      .
      2. Otherwise valid statement URIs that omit the version number should
      respond with code 404.
   4. Languages and translation
      1. Human-readable representations should dynamically handle requests
      for translations of the statements through HTTP Accept-Language
      headers
      <http://us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e1490d1305c4b651f3ad0ace4&id=32b281ecf5&e=e254285d2b>and
      through the use of parameters as specified in *Requirements for the
      Technical Infrastructure for Standardized International Rights Statements
      <http://us4.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=e1490d1305c4b651f3ad0ace4&id=dc4ab315f0&e=e254285d2b>*
      .
      2. The working group will provide text in one or more languages for
      each statement as RDF language-tagged literals in compliance with IETF
      BCP47
      <http://us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e1490d1305c4b651f3ad0ace4&id=10a5575a5d&e=e254285d2b>.
      All language-tagged literals will be encoded as UTF-8.
      3. The working group will provide translations for content not
      derived from the statement RDF, e.g., navigational elements. The
      application will support this through an internationalization framework,
      e.g., GNU gettext.
   5. Additional request parameters
      1. For specific statements, human-readable representations must
      accept query string parameters and generate a view of the statement
      enhanced by additional metadata described in *Requirements for the
      Technical Infrastructure for Standardized International Rights Statements
      <http://us4.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=e1490d1305c4b651f3ad0ace4&id=bc91875af4&e=e254285d2b>*
      .
   6. Resource URIs and HTTP request patterns
      1. The HTTP behavior of the application shall follow the URI
      structure and interaction patterns described in *Requirements for the
      Technical Infrastructure for Standardized International Rights Statements
      <http://us4.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=e1490d1305c4b651f3ad0ace4&id=cb76b704f2&e=e254285d2b>*
      .
      2. Resources must follow best practices
      <http://us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e1490d1305c4b651f3ad0ace4&id=ab8b21a5db&e=e254285d2b>
for
      serving both human- and machine-readable representations for linked data
      vocabularies.
   7. Visual identity
      1. The working group will provide static HTML templates developed by
      another vendor charged with implementing the site’s visual identity.
      2. These templates must be transformed to work in the context of the
      application to ensure that human-readable representations follow
the visual
      identity of the site as provided by the working group.

*Component B. Content management system*

An implementation of an off-the-shelf, free/libre/open source content
management system (CMS), and associated plugins to publish pages about the
project and initiative, related publications, etc.

   1. The CMS will be separate from the rights statements application.
   2. The CMS may be a static site generator.
   3. The CMS should support multilingual versions of content, either
   natively or through the use of plugin modules.
   4. A theme or templates for the CMS must be provided, which follow the
   visual identity defined for the site.
   5. The CMS must provide export of static content (text and multimedia).
   6. All content will be edited and maintained by members of the working
   group.

*Component C. Server configuration, deployment, and maintenance
implementation*

An implementation of an existing free/libre/open source configuration
management and deployment automation system, and any needed templates,
scripts, etc., used to install dependencies, to configure and deploy
components A and B above, and to manage the servers.

   1. The implementation must be published to a version control repository
   under the working group’s organization on GitHub.
   2. The implementation should support a shared set of configuration with
   templating to allow the components above to be deployed to a staging
   virtual machine and a production virtual machine using a common set of
   procedures.
   3. An implementation of an agentless configuration and deployment
   management system (e.g., Ansible) is strongly preferred.
   4. The implementation must include a configuration for an HTTP proxy
   server (e.g., Nginx, Apache HTTPD, etc.) that will allow components A and B
   to be presented together through a single domain name.
      1. The proxy server configuration must allow components A and B to be
      served from a common domain name (http://rightsstatements.org/).
      2. The proxy server configuration should provide caching for requests
      that respects the HTTP interaction patterns described in *Requirements
      for the Technical Infrastructure for Standardized International Rights
      Statements
      <http://us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e1490d1305c4b651f3ad0ace4&id=bf3be739da&e=e254285d2b>*
      .
   5. The vendor will also develop, execute, and provide reports for a load
   testing strategy for the implemented configuration.

Other restrictions

All components must run within a shared Linux virtual machine, preferably
running Debian stable. The virtual machine will be hosted on a server
physically located in a Luxembourg-based data center. The working group is
providing both a staging environment and a production environment.

All materials developed during this project shall be released under open
source/open content licensing. Source code will be licensed under the European
Union Public License, version 1.1
<http://us4.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=e1490d1305c4b651f3ad0ace4&id=4525dd11d2&e=e254285d2b>.
Documentation will be licensed under a CC0 Public Domain Dedication
<http://us4.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=e1490d1305c4b651f3ad0ace4&id=c4fd2bbc15&e=e254285d2b>
.
Guidelines for proposals

All proposals must adhere to the following submission guidelines and
requirements.

   - Proposals are due no later than 00:00 GMT, 6 October 2015.
   - Proposals should be sent via email to *[log in to unmask]
   <[log in to unmask]>* as a single PDF file attached to the message.
   Questions about the proposal can also be sent to this address.
   - Please format the subject line with the phrase
“*RightsStatements.org Proposal
   - [Name of respondent]*.”
   - You should receive confirmation of receipt of your proposal no later
   than 00:00 GMT, 8 October 2015. If you have not received confirmation of
   your proposal by this time, please send an email to *[log in to unmask]
   <[log in to unmask]>*, otherwise follow the same guidelines as above.

All proposals should include the following:

   - *Pricing*, in US Dollars and/or Euros, as costs for each work
   component identified above, and as an hourly rate for any maintenance
   costs. The exchange rate will be set in the contract. The currency for
   payment will be chosen by the agent of the working group that is the party
   to this contract.
   - *Proposed staffing plan*, including qualifications of project team
   members (resumes/CVs and links or descriptions of previous projects such as
   open source contributions).
   - *References*, listing all clients/organizations with whom the proposer
   has done business like that required by this solicitation with the last
   three years.
   - *Qualifications and experience*, including
      - General qualifications and development expertise
         - Information about development and project management skills and
         philosophy
         - Examples of successful projects, delivered on time and on budget
         - Preferred tools and methodologies used for issue tracking,
         project management, and communication
         - Preferences for change control tools and methodologies
      - Project specific strategies
         - History of developing software in the library, archives, or
         museum domain
         - Information about experience with hosting and maintenance of
         RDF/SKOS vocabularies and linked data resources
      - *Legal authority/capacity,* or proof that the vendor is authorized
   to perform the contract under national law. Proof of the above is to be
   provided by (a copy of) a certificate of registration in the relevant trade
   or professional registers in the country of establishment/incorporation.

Contract guidelines

   - Proposals must be submitted by the due date.
   - Proposers are asked to guarantee their proposal prices for a period of
   at least 60 days from the date of the submission of the proposal.
   - Proposers must be fully responsible for the acts and omissions of
   their employees and agents.
   - The working group reserves the right to extend the deadline for
   proposals.
   - The working group reserves the right to include a mandatory meeting
   via teleconference with proposers individually before acceptance. Top
   scored proposals may be required to participate in an interview to support
   and clarify their proposal.
   - The working group reserves the right to negotiate with each contractor.
   - There is no allowance for project expenses, travel, or ancillary
   expenses that the contractor may incur.
   - Ownership of any intellectual property will be shared between the
   Digital Public Library of America and the Europeana Foundation.




Mark A. Matienzo, Director of Technology
Digital Public Library of America | http://dp.la
[log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager